My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12111990
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990
>
CC PACKET 12111990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:09:50 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:09:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 12111990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Auguiar uouncu MUMMY, c <br /> November 27, 1990 ' <br /> 1 5. REPORTS: Planning Commission <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Commissioner Ron Hansen reported that the Planning Commission had a • <br /> 4 request from the Nedegaard Construction Co. for Evergreen Townhomes for a <br /> 5 sign variance. He referred to the Commission's November 20 minutes and <br /> 6 called attention to page 2, lines 22-38, of the minutes that regarded <br /> 7 discussion of the definition of a fence. The final Commission vote on the <br /> 8 variance was 3 for and 3 against. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 David Newman, representing Nedegaard Construction Co., presented two <br /> 11 photographs which show a monument on each side of the driveway and an <br /> 12 enlargement of a sign. He acknowledged that the City Council "was kind <br /> 13 enough" to allow his company to erect a second monument without a sign to <br /> 14 be in place as a marketing effort during the Parade of Homes. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Newman believes the variance request meets the three-part test: the signs <br /> 17 and proposal are very attractive and are not detrimental to the neighbors. <br /> 18 There has been no opposition from the neighbors to the signs; the signs <br /> 19 create a sense of neighborhood; the hardship and unique part of the test is <br /> 20 met because there are 37 individual lots and 2 private roads that service the <br /> 21 development which justify the use of more than one sign. He believes the <br /> 22 Planning Commission agreed with the argument up to that point. In <br /> 23 reviewing other suggestions, Newman said a pedestal based sign would be on <br /> 24 the right of way; therefore, causing public safety, snow plowing and other • <br /> 25 problems. He believes that using the 10' wide median would be unsafe and <br /> 26 cause a problem with snow storage. Also suggested was placement of two <br /> 27 signs at the entrance that is currently there and one sign at the other <br /> 28 entrance. The Company suggested that this may denote more of a service <br /> 29 entrance at the second driveway. Instead, the proposed signs on each side of <br /> 30 the entrance denote it to be an entrance to Evergreen Townhomes and to <br /> 31 have balance and symmetry. They have no intention to add addresses. As <br /> 32 the property owner, Newman believes his request is reasonable and not <br /> 33 excessive. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 If the Council grants the first variance for 4 signs the second request is to <br /> 36 increase the sign area from a maximum 150 to 200 square feet. The <br /> 37 additional square feet for the 4 sign surface areas is needed to complete the <br /> 38 project. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Makowske stated that she believed a precedent for signage for two entries <br /> 41 was set with the Autumn Woods variance. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Wagner said this was a different situation because this is a complete circle <br /> 44 and Autumn Woods was two separate entrances. • <br /> 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.