Laserfiche WebLink
44 <br /> DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP <br /> Michael J. Mornson <br /> July 19,2000 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The Redevelopment Contract does not contain any requirement as to when the landscaping and <br /> walking path would be completed. The time table attached as Exhibit C to the Redevelopment <br /> Contract has to do with the improvements to be constructed by the Hitching Post, and all of the <br /> provisions of Article IV of the Redevelopment Contract regarding construction have to do with the <br /> Hitching Post construction. They do not address any construction obligations of the HRA. <br /> I do not believe it was the intention of the parties that the City would have a contractual <br /> obligation to the Hitching Post to do the redevelopment improvements. As you know, if the HRA does <br /> not do the redevelopment improvements, St. Anthony Shopping Center L.L.C. is entitled to have the <br /> easements it granted the City terminated. If the improvements in front of the shopping center parcel are <br /> never made by the HRA, the City or HRA may or may not wish to do a walkway through the center <br /> adjoining the Hitching Post property. If the HRA elects not to do such work, I doubt that the Hitching <br /> Post would try to require the HRA to make any such improvements. <br /> • I hope this answers the questions you had, but if you have any further questions, please let me <br /> know. <br /> V truly yours, <br /> o <br /> William R. Soth <br /> WRS/ms <br /> Enclosures <br /> cc: Richard Krier(w/encl.) <br />