My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08151989
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1989
>
PL PACKET 08151989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:40:02 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1989
SP Name
PL PACKET 08171898
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> to how snowplowing could be done on a gravel lot . She also <br /> noted that the residents of Kenzington whose units face the <br /> parking lot would be subject to dust raised by traffic on a <br /> gravel lot. <br /> George Mitchell of 2601 Kenzie Terrace noted that <br /> Kenzington ' s visitor parking is inadequate. He wondered <br /> whether the Planning Commission had had anything to do with <br /> the parking design for the building. He stated his <br /> preference for an asphalt parking lot . He suggested that <br /> parking stalls could be marked on bumper posts . He indicated <br /> that he would prefer permanent overflow parking, and that he <br /> would like to see META donate the overflow parking area to <br /> Kenzington as a permanent parking facility. He also stated <br /> that the Kenzington is built on too small a lot , resulting in <br /> inadequate parking. <br /> Bill Hedburg of Kenzington stated his preference for a <br /> permanent parking facility. He suggested that the parking <br /> lot be lighted for security and safety reasons . <br /> Mr . Mitchell Arduser of 2601- Kenzie Terrace stated that, from <br /> his experience in the construction industry, the best way to <br /> • construct a parking lot is to lay down a gravel bed and allow <br /> it to settle before paving with asphalt. <br /> No further questions forthcoming from the public, Chair <br /> Madden re-presented the questions submitted to Mr. Tyson for <br /> his response. <br /> Mr . Tyson stated that the combination of a ten-foot strip of <br /> grass along with timbers would adequately prevent traffic <br /> from cutting across from Wilson to Kenzie. He indicated that <br /> the proposed timbers are generally considered not to be <br /> mountable by vehicles , and would be anchored into the ground <br /> so that they could not be removed. He noted that the Legion <br /> post ' s use of the property was very different from what <br /> Kenzington' s use of the property will be, and foresaw a more <br /> orderly traffic and parking pattern . Mr . Tyson indicated <br /> that fencing would be in the nature of a permanent structure <br /> and inconsistent with a temporary parking lot, and declined <br /> to commit to erecting a fence as a barrier . <br /> Mr. Tyson agreed that it would not be possible to paint <br /> stripes designating parking stalls on a gravel surface. <br /> Ms . Finlay asked to be allowed to respond to the question of <br /> • monitoring unauthorized parking. She suggested that each <br /> parking stall be marked with a bumper post, and that 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.