Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> allocated for Multi-family rehabilitation would be deleted due to <br /> difficulties of implementing such a project. $16, 679 would be used <br /> • to pay the H.R.A. Planning Consultant' s charges for the Kenzie Terrace <br /> Project and the allocation for the Latch Key program would be admini- <br /> stered by the Community Services. The Manager anticipates the <br /> remainder of the Year VI and VII funds would be expended within the <br /> next 90 days and said he intends to prepare a chart reflecting where <br /> these changes in allocations had been made for Council consideration <br /> for approval March 22nd. <br /> The hearing was closed at. 8: 25 P.M. <br /> Motion by Mr. Bjorklund 'and seconded by Mr. Bowerman to recommend the <br /> Council accept the staff recommendation regarding the amendment of the <br /> City' s Year VI, VII , VIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development <br /> Block Grant planning allocation as follows : <br /> Year VI Kenzie Terrace Study $16 , 679 <br /> Year VII Site Acquisition/Assisted Housing 40 ,000 <br /> Year VII Administration 1 ,000 <br /> Year VII Removal of Architectural Barriers 7 ,000 <br /> Year VII Rehabilitation of Single Family Homes 18 , 385 <br /> Year VII Public Services-Senior Programs 2 ,091 <br /> Year VIII Assistance to Low and Moderate Income 15 ,000 <br /> Housing : Street Improvements <br /> Year VIII Right-of-Way Acqusition-Sidewalks 21, 128 <br /> Year VIII Rehabilitation of Single Family Homes 30 , 773 <br /> • Year VIII Public Services-Latch Key Program 2 , 460 <br /> Year VIII Public Services-Senior Programs 2 ,640 <br /> Year VIII Administration 1 , 540 <br /> The Planning Commission recommends these funds be reallocated so as <br /> to avoid their loss , finding that these activities (1) would be <br /> consistent with past uses of CDBG funds; (2) would meet all the criteria <br /> set for such activities by the Housing and Urban Development Agency <br /> and Hennepin County; (3) had been adequately publicized; and (4) <br /> had received ample public and Planning Commission input before the <br /> .recommendation of approval was made. <br /> Motion carried unanimously . <br /> Mr. Krier gave an historical background of the tentative appointment <br /> of the Arkell Development group to develop the Kenzie Terrace Re- ' <br /> development Project and indicated the meeting that evening was intended <br /> to give the Planning Commission members an opportunity to provide some <br /> feedback on what they would like to see in the Planned Unit Develop- <br /> ment for the project. He told them their reaction to the concept <br /> plan for the project would be sought as well as their recommendations <br /> to the Council regarding the sale of the Phase 1 project property, <br /> which the H.R.A. intends to acquire in April , to the redevelopers. <br /> The planner also asked them to set a date for the public hearing on <br /> the preliminary P.U.D. plan. <br /> • Steve -Yurick and Tom Arkell of Arkell Development and Gary Tushie of <br /> Saunders-Thalden Associates , Inc. representing the two firms , who are <br />