Laserfiche WebLink
^ca <br /> 1 Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $940.00 to • <br /> 2 StayWell Health Management Systems for EAR services annually. <br /> 3 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 4 Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Marks to approve payment of $19 .627.86 <br /> 5 to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for October sewer services. <br /> 6 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 7 Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $50 ,082.00 <br /> 8 to Calgon Carbon Corporation for services on the temporary granular <br /> 9 activated carbon system and including a carbon change out. <br /> 10 Motion carried .unanimously. <br /> 11 Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Ranallo to approve payment of $31 .681. 25 <br /> 12 to the Marquette Bank as payment due bondholders October 1, 1989 on the <br /> 13 St. Anthony General Obligation Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1988. <br /> 14 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 15 Motion by Makowske, seconded by Marks to approve payment of $36,852. 19 <br /> 16 to Hi-Ranger Midwest for an aerial unit. <br /> 17 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 18 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - STATE REPRESENTATIVE MARY JO MCGUIRE <br /> 19 District 63B Representative McGuire distributed copies of her September <br /> 20 25th response to a letter sent to the City by State Representative <br /> 21 Eileen Tompkins related to tax legislation which was later vetoed by the <br /> 22 Governor. Representative McGuire reiterated her defense of her own <br /> 23 votes, indicating she perceived the implications related to those votes <br /> 24 as well as the effect on St. Anthony's levy limit base had been <br /> 25 erroneous. <br /> 26 The Representative said she would be attending an early morning caucus <br /> 27 on the legislation which would be proposed during the Special <br /> 28 Legislative Session that week and would carry the City's concerns about <br /> 29 the effect of that legislation to that caucus. <br /> 30 Councilmember Ranallo had indicated his objections to the City being <br /> 31 forced to "use it or lose it" when it came to the levy limit base which <br /> 32 he perceived could lead to irresponsible use of tax revenues just <br /> 33 because they're available. <br /> 34 Councilmember Marks speculated that changes in the property taxes might <br /> 35 result in more regressive total state taxes for St. Anthony residents, <br /> 36 if tax rates on homes over $100,000.00 are raised. That "philosophical <br /> 37 concept" would also be presented for discussion during the caucus, . <br /> 38 Representative McGuire said. • <br /> 2 <br />