My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 02161993
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1993
>
PL PACKET 02161993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:26:15 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:26:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1993
SP Name
PL PACKET 02161993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING • <br /> 2 JANUARY 19, 1993 <br /> 3 PAGE 10 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Urbia advised that the Plannng Commission by laws were <br /> 7 approved by the City Council . <br /> 8 <br /> 9 B. 1993 Calendar <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Members of the Planning Commission received copies of the <br /> 12 1993 Planning Commission calendar . <br /> 13 <br /> 14 C. Planning Commissioner Terms of Office <br /> 15 <br /> 16 A staff report was prepared by Urbia stating the terms of <br /> 17 office for members of the Planning Commission . <br /> 18 <br /> 19 D. Letter From Chair of Planning Commission <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Copies of a letter dated December 21 , 1992 from the <br /> 22 Planning Commission Chair to members of the City Council <br /> 23 were included in the agenda packet . <br /> 24 <br /> 25 The letter reviewed the activities , accomplishments and <br /> 26 issues addressed by the Planning Commission in 1992 . The • <br /> 27 letter also recognized the hard work of the city staff <br /> 28 and members of the Planning Commission as well as the <br /> 29 cooperation of the City Council . <br /> 30 <br /> 31 E. Staff Report - Sign Ordinance Issue <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Previously, Commissioner Madden had suggested that Subs . <br /> 34 2 ( 1 ) be amended to require each identification sign <br /> 35 allowed per right-of-way frontage to face the frontage . <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Urbia noted that the staff recommendation is to allow <br /> 38 more flexibility in these types of situations . Staff also <br /> 39 felt a more restrictive ordinance could be viewed as <br /> 40 harassing business owners in - the City. Urbia stated that <br /> 41 members of the Planning Commission can discuss this <br /> 42 matter directly with members of the City Council . It <br /> 43 would not be a problem to change the newly recodified <br /> 44 ordinance. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Commissioner Madden inquired what was the rationale to <br /> 47 allow two signs on a business which fronts on two <br /> 48 streets . Urbia responded this would afford the business <br /> 49 more visibility. <br /> 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.