Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT—RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION <br /> 4ILV9R LAKE CENTER COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPME <br /> RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)NT C <br /> F� <br /> outside the subject property)following the construction of the first three ponds (Phase 1). The <br /> inclusion of the fourth basin will result!n further stormwater discharge rate reductions and will <br /> provide a 45 percent total reduction in phosphorus discharge relative to existing conditions. All <br /> stormwater ponding will meet or exceed RCWD permitting standards. <br /> Also stated in the EAW is the fact that all site grading and erosion control activities are subject to <br /> !lice Creek Watershed District(RCWO)and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System <br /> (NPD!~S)permits and will comply with pertinent requirements as described in the required Grading <br /> and Erosion Control Plan which will likely incorporate multiple Best Management Practices(RMP). <br /> Because the site lacks steep slopes and numerous BAs will be implemented, sfgniflcarst adverse <br /> - impacts from eonstruedon-related sediment and erosion are not expected <br /> Minnesota Historical Society, Britta Bloomberg, February 2, 1996 <br /> The Minnesota Historical Society indicated that the probability of unknown historical or araboological <br /> properties being present on the site is low, and therefore the"no"response to question 26a is <br /> appropriate. <br /> Response: So noted for the record. The project proposer and the RGU appreciate confirmation of <br /> the accuracy of the EAW with respect to Item 26a. <br /> Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,Thomas W. Balcom, February 14, 1996 <br /> The DNR stated"we have no comments to offer on the project at this time. Preparation of an ETS is <br /> not merited in our opinion." <br /> Response: So noted for the record. <br /> Minnesota Department of Health,Kathy Svande, Fe.bruary 14, 1996 <br /> The MDH <br /> Response: So noted for the record <br />