Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> • July 8, 1997 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 1 Dennis Palmer, Barr Engineering, stated the City had hired him in 1992 to perform a study of <br /> 2 surface water drainage problems in district #6 of St. Anthony. Based on his experience and <br /> 3 data supplied by the City, a computer model was formed. Different solutions were then <br /> 4 applied-to the model. This resulted in three options. The first option was to do nothing in <br /> 5 terms of structure but to react in terms of moratoriums and zoning. This was the cheapest <br /> 6 alternative. The second alternative was to increase the capacity of the outlet trunk in New <br /> 7 Brighton Boulevard. This was not possible as it was determined that there is no capacity <br /> 8 available for the City of St. Anthony as it is being used to capacity by other cities. It was <br /> 9 then determined to build a new pipe from Lowry Avenue and Highway 88 down to the <br /> 10 freeway to augment the capacity of the pipe. This option would cost $12 to $16 million. The <br /> 11 third option was to build a storage pond to hold the water until the capacity is available in the <br /> 12 pipe. The combination of a storage pond and selective pipe capacity increase would allow for <br /> 13 an increase in capacity to handle a 100 year storm event. <br /> 14 These three options were then presented and at that time several citizens came forward and <br /> 15 stated they felt the City could not afford the dollar amounts. They felt the City needed to <br /> 16 deal with the issue in the form of a non-structural solution. It has been suggested that the <br /> 17 area be declared a flood hazard zone to enable residents to purchase flood insurance. The <br /> 18 FEMA has stated it is not possible to declare an area a flood zone when the flooding is <br /> occurring due'to inadequate storm sewer capacity. <br /> 20 Mr. Palmer stated that he had been asked to attend the meeting this evening to explain the <br /> 21 results of the 1992 study and also to answer questions. He was not here to defend the City. <br /> 22 The City is concerned and frustrated with the situation. He suggested a consensus process is <br /> 23 needed to help people understand what alternatives are available and to provide feedback to <br /> 24 the City of what solution is acceptable. He suggested that if it were necessary to purchase 10 <br /> 25 to 18 homes, it may be as expensive as $10 million and it will also affect the tax base. He <br /> 26 also noted that based on the United States Weather Bureau Chart, a 100 year storm event <br /> 27 would occur if 3.5 inches of rain were received in two hours. In this storm 3.5 inches of rain <br /> 28 were received in just 28 minutes. He stated that even if the $6 million solution had been in <br /> 29 place, the July 1, 1997 storm would have exceeded the storm water capacity. <br /> 30 Mayor Ranallo noted all the homes on 34th Avenue and Edward Street have sump pumps and <br /> 31 valves and have done what they could to keep the water out of their basements but this sends <br /> 32 all the water to the other end.of town. <br /> 33 Mr. Jacobs stated this was a Band-Aid for the problem and not a solution.' He felt the entire <br /> 34 community needed to work together. <br /> 35 Mr. Lohmar noted these remedies solve the issue of the storm sewer backing up but do not <br /> 36 resolve the issue of the surface water. <br /> Ms. Kuharski stated she was grateful for the 1992 study. She stated she did not agree with <br /> 38 the taking of 11 to 18 homes in the area, as many good residents would be lost as well as <br /> 39 effects on the tax base. She stated she would be willing to give up the baseball field, where <br />