Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> DATE: May 19, 1998 <br /> TO: Planning Commissioners <br /> FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant <br /> ITEM: 98-05 David G. Newgaard, 3123 Silver Lake Road <br /> Lot Width Variance Request. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> David G. Newgaard submitted a lot width variance application for the vacant lot at 3123 Silver <br /> Lake Road..,Mr. Newgaard reported to Staff that his mother, who resided at 3127 Silver Lake <br /> Road, split her lot years ago, which created 3123 Silver Lake Road. He and his brother <br /> inherited these two properties and are interested in selling 3123 Silver Lake Road. The lot, <br /> which is zoned residential, is 66 feet wide, rather than the required 75 feet wide, and is not <br /> currently a buildable lot. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that several conditions must be-satisfied for <br /> approval of a variance request. No variance can be granted unless evidence is presented that <br /> strict enforcement of the Ordinance will cause undue hardship; that the circumstances causing <br /> the hardship were not created by the owner; that the property cannot be put to reasonable use <br /> without the variance; if the variance is granted, it will not change the essential character of the <br /> area; and economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship. <br /> Because the current owners inherited this property from their mother, the circumstances <br /> causing the need to request a-variance were not caused by the owners. Mr. Newgaard stated to <br /> Staff that his mother had the lot split years ago and it is platted as a separate lot on the <br /> Hennepin County Plat Maps. <br /> As shown by th e plat map, several residential properties along Silver Lake Road are less than <br /> the required 75 feet. The owners of those properties have either obtained a lot width variance <br /> or are grandfathered in. In order for the vacant lot on 3123 Silver Lake Road to be buildable, <br /> which would be a reasonable use in this residential district, it will require a lot width variance <br /> and the granting of this variance request will not alter the essential character of the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> While it is true that the owners are requesting this lot width variance because the lot will be <br /> more saleable with a variance, economic considerations are not the only reason for their <br /> variance request. <br />