Laserfiche WebLink
-6- <br /> of the G & G Body Shop, and $.25,000 for staff administration, or a. <br /> • total of $150,000 ' to be' picked. up by the City through tax increment <br /> financing. This amount -reflected.--a $19,_9:15 yield-.in taxes--from the <br /> 38 _one-bedroom units he estimated ,to be worth- $4.9,0.0.0 ..-per, unit and <br /> $13, 205 .from the 16 two-bedroom_.units worth $59 ,500 .each'. <br /> The Manager said the $6,000 in taxes the City now realizes :from that <br /> same property had not been considered in these figures. He also saw <br /> some problems with respect to variances being required- by City ordi- <br /> nance, since there may be. inadequate setbacks. .result.ing from the <br /> creation of the new zero .lot line between the two -buildings, and this <br /> problem would have to be resolved before any definite commitment to <br /> the project is given by the City to HUD. Councilman. Sundland saw <br /> only 13 parking spaces for the rental units. Councilman Ranallo <br /> agreed with Mayor Haik there were just too many questions about the <br /> new proposal for the Council to support a formal resolution of sup- <br /> port to be sent to HUD. ' He was also reluctant to support a whole <br /> new concept when the residents have not been informed that this <br /> proposal involves -cooperative apartments which were not part of the <br /> proposal on which the previous hearings -had--been held. - The Mayor <br /> wanted assurances that after the control of , the apartments had passed <br /> from the corporation to an owner association, - that body might decide <br /> not to change the apartments from exclusively senior housing to <br /> family residences so the owners might -pass on ownership to their <br /> children. <br /> Archie Fjeld saw HUD as firmly committed to this type of housing <br /> • for this particular area and felt that, -rather than a commitment <br /> from the City to any particular type of .housing, an. indication in <br /> letter form of acceptance of--the concept of senior housing for St. <br /> Anthony should be sufficient .to permit the senior corporation to <br /> meet the March 31 application deadline for seeking .HUD .financing. - <br /> Carroll Peterson, another board member, urged the 'Council to provide <br /> the necessary documentation of approval saying he saw this new pro- <br /> posal as perhaps a better one for St. Anthony since this will pro- <br /> vide more affordable housing for more- people than -the first and will <br /> open more single housing for young families when the seniors are <br /> able to find acceptable housing within the community.. , <br /> ' Councilman Marks- .said the senior corporation -had experienced a <br /> greater disappointment than.-:-the City when the court ruling-.pro- <br /> hibited their first proposal from .materializing, ,and he believed <br /> they should be commended for continuing their efforts, to :provide <br /> an acceptable type of senior housing for the City, and that the <br /> Council should cooperate in providing the mechanisms by which -the <br /> concept can be realized. <br /> Councilman Letourneau was skeptical that an acceptable proposal <br /> could be developed within the time limitations- and said he would <br /> "vote against any attempt to rush through another proposal. " How- <br /> ever, when. it was agreed that. no specific concept was -being -ap- <br /> proved and the corporation board members agreed -to- provide a specific <br /> proposal to which a committee comprised of City staff .and represen- <br /> tation from both the. Council and Planning Commission can react in <br /> advance of any public hearing, he joined -the others in -approving a . <br /> letter of support of the senior housing concept for the City which <br /> can be sent to HUD. <br />