CC MINUTES 09281982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-10- "since they have made . a substantial investment in the City and have abided by the City 's ordinances for 21 years , there should be some concessions made for them" . Councilman Enrooth agreed, saying he wonders "whether the issues which had initiated these ordinance_ changes really had anything to do with restaurants at all" . Councilman Marks then offered an amendment to the motion approving the second reading of Ordinance 1982-006 which would delete the reference to restaurants , delicatessens , and cafeterias from the ordinance. His motion to amend failed to get a second. Voting on the original motion: Aye: Ranallo, Sundland, Letourneau, and Marks . Nay : Enrooth. Motion carried. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to approve the second. reading of Ordinance 1982-007 with changes as recommended at the.. September 14th Council meeting. ORDINANCE 1982-007 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES WITHIN A GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT . "C" ; AMENDING SUBDIVISIONS 2 AND--1-3 • OF SECTION 9. OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE ATTACHED AS APPENDIX I TO THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES BY DELETING CERTAIN. USES AS PERMITTED USES AND ADDING USES AS CONDITIONAL USES WITHIN THE "C" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Motion carried unanimously. The City Attorney had included in his September 22nd memorandum wording which could be substituted for the first three sections of Ordinance 1982-008 which was before the Council for a second read- ing, if the Council agrees to freeze all beer licenses , including those for restaurants , at their existing levels . Councilman Ranallo indicated that was exactly his intent with the motion he had origin- ally made August 10th. Mr. Soth _said the version which had been given its first reading at the last Council meeting had been developed along the lines suggested by the Planning Commission that beer licenses should be given the same treatment as wine in the City 's wine ordinance. He said the more restrictive version would eventu- ally close out all beer licenses in the City which he added he had ascertained "you have the authority to do" . Mayor Sundland said he was going to support the serving of beer in restaurants -because he believes their main function is serving of meals as compared to facilities where meals are only incidental to their other functions . • Motion by Mayor Sundland and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to approve the second reading of Ordinance 1982-008 with only changes made by the City Attorney to clarify "closing" and "minors" .