CC MINUTES 09281982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-3- Councilman Ranallo indicated it had .been a victory for the cities when Governor Quie had changed his mind on the budget guidelines following . opposition from the A.M.M.A. The September Fire and August .Police Department reports were accepted as informational. Chief Hickerson reported -the seven police reserves who will complete their training in December would be presented to the Council to be sworn in December=14th. Motion by Councilman Ranallo. and. seconded by Councilman Enrooth to appoint the judges chosen for the General Election November 2 , 1982 , as listed in the October 12 , 1982 Council agenda. Motion carried unanimous.!-Y--!- Judy nanimousay-;Judy Makowske reported on the special Planning .Commission meeting held October 5th relative. to the application for a conditional use permit for the drive-in facility , as well as- variances for parking and signage , for the Zantigo Restaurant proposed to-.be constructed on the south- eastern corner of Apache- Plaza Shopping. .Center. She said the Commission members had been satisfied:! .that .the drive-in aspect of the restaurant, as. proposed, should be no detriment to the neighborhood since the type of food -served.-in the Mexican restaurant, would not .generate the same type of drive through .traffic as would be associated with a fast food facility , such as McDonald's . • Mr. Berg showed the site plansfor the project, including parking , landscaping and traffic- patterns which the Commission had indicated they believed had been designed so as to pose no pedestrian problems . Motion by Councilman Ranallo and .seconded by Councilman Enrooth to grant a conditional use permit to Zantigo KFC National Management Co. , which would permit -a drive-in facility for the restaurant they propose to construct .on Lot 3, Block 1 of Apache Plaza, finding as did the Planning Commission, that: (_1) The proposed conditional -use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning district in which it is to be located. (2)_ The proposed conditional use will .not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing ,or working in the , vicinity or injurious to property values or improvements- in the vicinity. (3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of the public convenience and' will contribute .to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community . (=4)_ There was no opposition to- the proposal demonstrated either during • the hearing before the Planning Commission or the Council consideration.