CC MINUTES 09271983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-2- Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by * Councilman Enrooth to • grant a multiple housing permit to Lakehill Apartments , 3804 Highcrest Road. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to approve payment of $273. 50 to Dorsey & Whitney for legal services during July, 1983. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to approve payment of $3, 180 to the Health -Fitness Consultants for the fitness evaluations and orientation presentations conducted under the City employees ' fitness program, initiated this year. Motion carried unanimously. The statement from the Barr Engineering Co. had been distributed by the City Manager who- explained the company 's total costs had exceeded their contract limits because additional hydrologist study was necessary when it was discovered that erroneous pumping .data had been provided by the Twin City Arsenal.. The City, based on: their agreement with Barr Engineering, is only obligated to $3,6.00 . 00 of the $4 , 650 .00 in costs and the proposed final payment would bring the total of • payments to $3,600 . 00 . Motion by Councilman Marls and seconded by :Councilman Ranallo to approve payment .of $1, 843-. 81 to Barr Engineering Co. for their investigation of Well #3 during the period extending from February 27th through April 2, 1983. Motion carried unanimously . Brad Bjorklund .reported actions taken and recommendations made to the Council by the Planning Commission during. their September 20 , 1983. meeting, as reflected in the minutes of that meeting. The Planning Commission representative indicated he believed several clarifications of those minutes were necessary. He wanted "and Council" inserted after "Commission" and "school district" . substituted for "other official meetings" in Lines 1 and 3 in paragraph 5 on page 2 . The Commissioner indicated Commissioner Bowerman's statement in the third paragraph on page 4 could probably be more easily understood if the word "but" were substituted for "not" in the middle of line 15 . He also believed changing Mrs . Basara' s "only concern" to "primary concern" in line 5 of the fifth paragraph on page 5 would more accurately reflect that resident' s statement. Mr. Bjorklund- also wanted the last paragraph on that same page expanded to -indicate he had asked Mrs . Basara a series of questions about her reaction -to the higher building, as contrasted to previous proposals , and, when he had asked her if she liked the building proposed this time., she had replied "no" . On page 6 , Commissioner Bjorklund believed all the questions should have been reported which had been put to the redevelopers to identify