Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> Motion by Councilman- Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to <br /> • authorize staff to write a letter to Columbia Heights informing them <br /> of the Salvation Army' s refusal to participate in the Stinson Project <br /> and to inquire whether that City is still interested in the project. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Although the Salvation Army still recognizes their responsibility to <br /> pay all the costs of the study done for Phase 1, Mr. Hamer indicated <br /> the Camp officials have requested continuance of that payment until <br /> this spring, at which time their Property Committee would make a <br /> final assessment of the problem and make a determination as to whether <br /> or not they. should proceed with the County Road E Project. The Public <br /> Works Director then indicated, that, even if the project proceeds, <br /> it may be some time before it becomes a reality since New Brighton <br /> hasn't even held the required public hearings yet. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded .by Councilman Makowske to <br /> approve payment of $6 ,071. 81 to Short-Elliott-Hendrickson Inc. for <br /> the feasibility and cost study they made on the project proposed to <br /> correct the drainage erosion problem along County Road E. <br /> .Motion carried unanimously. <br /> In his February 3rd memorandum, Mr. Childs had given the historical <br /> background of the City ' s termination in 1983 of the highly appreciated, <br /> but very expensive, annual branch chipping project for which the <br /> • Council had subsequently directed the staff to explore alternatives <br /> for reinstating in 1984 , giving consideration to users fees as a <br /> primary financing method. The Manager had proposed four alternatives <br /> including their costs and what he perceives are the weaknesses and <br /> strong points of each and had suggested criteria under which the <br /> staff could recommend undertaking the service. <br /> There was general support for Alternative #3 which would provide the <br /> chipping service on a cost recovery basis but Councilmen Ranallo and <br /> Enrooth seemed to favor running the program this year under option <br /> "B" for that proposal which would charge a flat rate of $20 per stop, <br /> which would prevent disputes between the residents and City crews who <br /> would serve as the "timekeepers" , rather than option "A" under which <br /> a resident would be billed $15 for the first 10 minutes of chipping <br /> and an additional $15 for every 10 minutes thereafter, to avoid poten- <br /> tial, problems with neighbors pooling their branches . The following <br /> motion was made when it became apparent that the majority favored the <br /> "A" approach. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth- to rein- <br /> state the branch chipping program in St. Anthony in 1984 under Alter- <br /> native 3A proposed by the Manager in the February 14 , 1984 Council <br /> agenda. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> • <br />