Laserfiche WebLink
•4 <br /> -2- <br /> Councilmen Marks and Makowske arrived from the .public hearing which <br /> had been held in another room in the same building. <br /> • Wayne B. Leonard, Coordinating Engineer for the Ramsey County Public <br /> Works Departments , and Vern Genzlinger of, the Hennepin County Depart- <br /> ment of Transportation, were present at the invitation of the -Manager <br /> to give a progress report. on the rebuilding of County Road D. Mr. <br /> Leonard said he anticipates contracts on the project would be let in <br /> July and the construction would start this- fall . However, although a <br /> significant amount of work would probably not be accomplished in 1984 , <br /> he said he anticipates the project would be well on its way by 1985 . <br /> The County Engineer told Councilman Marks all issues which had to be <br /> negotiated had been resolved., with the exception of the school dis- <br /> trict' s request for a flashing stop sign in front of the Wilshire <br /> School, which could be installed, if the district is willing to pay <br /> the costs which could run between $3,000 and $6 ,000 for the sign. <br /> In his February 10th memorandum,. the Manager had indicated staff had <br /> recommended approval of the maintenance agreements with Ramsey County <br /> for the County Road D project he had included .with the proposed <br /> resolution in the agenda packet. Mr. Genzlinger indicated Hennepin <br /> County is in the process of acquiring the necessary right-of-ways <br /> and their maintenance agreements would be forthcoming. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Mayor Sundland • to adopt <br /> Resolution 84-014 . <br /> • RESOLUTION 84-414 <br /> A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER <br /> TO EXECUTE THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS NOS . 80414 <br /> AND 80415 BETWEEN THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY AND <br /> RAMSEY COUNTY FOR THE COUNTY ROAD D PROJECT <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> In his January 26th memorandum, Mr. Hamer had reported on the two <br /> separate projects proposed to' correct drainage problems involving <br /> Salvation Army Camp property and the City of Columbia Heights . To <br /> distinguish between the two, he had identified the project proposed <br /> to correct the drainage problem along the north end of the camp as <br /> Phase 1, the County Road E Project, and the project which would deal <br /> with the drainage problems and street construction in Columbia Heights <br /> which extends onto the west side of Salvation Army property, as Phase <br /> II , the Stinson Project. <br /> The Salvation Army had agreed to pay the costs of the feasibility and <br /> cost study done by Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for Phase I , but <br /> had declined to participate in Phase II since they perceived no bene- <br /> fit could be derived . from the street construction project on that side <br /> of the camp since they were not interested in selling or developing <br /> that land, according to the Public Works Director. <br /> Mr. Hamer indicated the Stinson Project was still in the talking stages <br /> • <br /> and he was now seeking Council direction as to whether or not he <br /> should continue discussions with Columbia Heights about the project. <br />