Laserfiche WebLink
-9- <br /> the Council had decided to hold this hearing to get resident input towards the <br /> Council decision in that regard, Mayor Sundland said. <br /> Jim Molinard, 2505 St. Anthony Boulevard, was told Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. , <br /> the City' s engineers, that the City would bid the job. He wanted to know whether, <br /> if the bid came in below the MSA allocation, the difference could be applied towards <br /> reducing the property owners assessment for the project and it was explained to him <br /> that under the City's Assessment Policy all residential owners, whether their <br /> streets are MSA funded or not, are to be assessed $10.50 per front foot, the <br /> assumption being that the first eight feet of street in front of their homes benefit <br /> the property owners as parking space and that since the middle of the street is <br /> used by everyone, that portion should be paid for from either MSA funds for a 9 ton <br /> design or the General Fund for a 5 ton road. Mayor Sundland indicated he perceived <br /> the state required the 9 ton design because that type of street could be expected <br /> to last longer. <br /> At this point, Mr. Kausel said he believed the 9 ton design was required to provide <br /> a truck weight load for the street and he questioned why, since the agreement the <br /> City has with the Minneapolis Park Board had forbidden any truck traffic on the <br /> Boulevard at all , the street had to be built to accomodate trucks. The Mayor <br /> told him the City's experience had been that MSA funds were available for only 9 <br /> ton streets, which Mr. Campbell indicated was correct, saying it was a statewide <br /> MSA policy to require all streets so funded to be 9 ton. When questioned about <br /> what it would cost to rebuild the section of the Boulevard south of the bridge, <br /> past the golf course, the engineer estimated that project would run in excess of <br /> $500,000. <br /> • Mr. Gottwalt indicated he had moved away from another MSA street, 33rd Avenue N.E. , <br /> to get away from the heavy traffic and trucks, and, although he agreed there are <br /> truckers who ignore the signs on the street, and it might help to -have City police. <br /> "crack down harder", the homeowner said he perceived it was almost impossible to <br /> keep trucks off any street no matter where it is in the metropolitan area. The <br /> homeowner saw one advantage for the people living on his street and that was its <br /> location between a parkway in Minneapolis and a golf course on the other end because <br /> truck drivers might be a little more reticent to drive on a parkway. Mr. Gottwalt <br /> said his biggest concern was that, if the MSA funds aren't used now, and might not <br /> be available later, the homeowners could eventually pay $50 instead of $10 when <br /> the street eventually has to be rebuilt. The property owner indicated he saw no <br /> choice but to build the road now to the required design and width while MSA funds <br /> are still available. <br /> Mr. Smoka asked whether the City could do anything about the truck traffic, saying <br /> he had lived on St. Anthony Boulevard since 1951 and perceived "the last years had <br /> really been bad, and it's getting worse", He perceived the truck drivers just <br /> ignored the "No Trucks" sign and said "even semi 's go through". Mayor Sundland said <br /> he wasn't certain the City could legally restrict truck traffic on MSA streets <br /> but the City had been posting streets like 2.9th Avenue N.E. against trucks all <br /> along. He said the residents on that street are still complaining about truck <br /> traffic. The Mayor added that the City's streets are the only ones which are so <br /> posted. <br /> Mr. Kausel gave the historic background of how fine customized homes had happened <br /> • to be built in the 50's along what at that time was the Minneapolis parkway system. <br /> He explained that the signature on the "Rebuttal" which the Mayor read, represented <br /> the 44 abutting property owners on St. Anthony Boulevard. When the Mayor asked <br /> Mr. Kausel if it was the position of those homeowners that the agreement which _ <br />