Laserfiche WebLink
Council Action <br /> Because Councilmember Ranallo is actively associated with formulating the <br /> League ' s budget, Mr. Soth agreed with him it might be prudent for the <br /> Councilmember to abstain from the motion on the insurance package. <br /> Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Marks to approve the 1987-88 insurance <br /> renewal package presented by the American Risk Services representative at <br /> the May 12 , 1987 Council meeting, except for the umbrella coverage which <br /> was not available, and subject to the best deductibles staff is able to <br /> negotiate with the League Insurance Trust. <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: Enrooth, Marks, Sundland, Makowske. <br /> Abstention: Ranallo. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> ORDINANCE 1987-002 IS ADOPTED WITHOUT SPECIFYING NUMBER OF PARKED <br /> • VEHICLES BY A 3 TO 2 COUNCIL VOTE <br /> Removal of Article #14 of the proposed ordinance which restricted the <br /> number of vehicles to be parked on a residential lot to 4, had been <br /> approved with a 3 to 1 vote, April 28th. Mayor Sundland read aloud the <br /> revised Ordinance in the agenda packet and gave his understanding of the <br /> changes which would be made in the 1973 Code of Ordinances, if that <br /> version were to be adopted that evening. <br /> Councilmember Enrooth told the nine residents who were present that after <br /> from six to ten months of discussions, the general consensus appeared to <br /> have been that there hadn' t been too much public response related to <br /> changing the number of people who can live in a household, but the <br /> greatest response addressed the number of vehicles. <br /> Mayor Sundland commented that he didn' t think anyone could accuse the <br /> Council of "railroading" the changes through with all the hearings the <br /> Council had held and the publicity that generated on the issue. <br /> Four residents requested to be heard as follows: <br /> Kathleen (Mrs. Gary) Danyo, 3540 Edward Street N.E. <br /> -indicated she was expressing her husband' s as well as her own con- <br /> cerns about the proposed ordinance, specifically about the parking <br /> .issue; <br />