My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 05121987
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1987
>
CC MINUTES 05121987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:48:38 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1987
SP Name
CC MINUTES 05121987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_10- <br /> -said they wanted the section which had restricted vehicles on a lot <br /> to four reinstated in the ordinance because she perceived if the City <br /> allowed four to be parked, some people would park more than that in <br /> defiance of the ordinance; <br /> -cited as an example the fact that some residents had completely <br /> ignored the sprinkling ban, even knowing the City' s water supply was <br /> very low; <br /> -insisted there had to be "more teeth" in the ordinance to correct <br /> some of the existing problems with "unsightly" vehicles parked <br /> around the Village; <br /> -said she and her husband spend a lot of time keeping their property <br /> up and even pay to have a boat and trailer they own parked elsewhere <br /> so their neighbors won' t have to look at them from their backyards; <br /> -said she wanted "the City to have the same kind of concerns about all <br /> the City yards. " <br /> Frank Koes, 2817 Stinson Boulevard <br /> -said he had a hard time accepting the fact that under the new ordin- <br /> ance he would no longer be able to park a utility trailer and a 14 <br /> • foot fishing boat on the grass in his backyard; <br /> -indicated he did not consider trailers or boats to be "eyesores" but <br /> rather, "sort of symbols of the society we live in" ; <br /> -reported it would cost him more than the boat was worth to store it <br /> every winter; <br /> -stated he believed the new ordinance "went too far towards inter- <br /> fering with his freedoms" ; <br /> -was told that he could put patio blocks under his vehicles without <br /> getting a permit, but a permit would be required if he had a con- <br /> tractor put in a concrete surface; <br /> -indicated he thought the ordinance wouldn't get at the problems it <br /> was supposed to correct and, would only cause problems for people <br /> like himself where most of the vehicles parked on his property are <br /> only temporary and would be gone when his children leave home. <br /> Bob Lohmar, 2812 St. Anthony Road <br /> -said he wanted the Council to pass as strict an ordinance as they <br /> could that evening; <br /> -pointed to a property at 3208 Roosevelt Street N.E. which had been on <br /> • the market for almost a year which, he was convinced, had not sold <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.