Laserfiche WebLink
1 -4- <br /> • 2 <br /> 3 b. The three conditions required to be satisfied for a variance had <br /> 4 been found in the affirmative by both the Commission and the <br /> 5 Councilmembers; <br /> 6 <br /> 7 c. This request was for a unique situation in which the anchor ten- <br /> 8 ant would have no identification on the shopping center' s Silver <br /> 9 Lake Road access without the variance and the space to be occu- <br /> 10 pied had been vacant for six years. <br /> 11 <br /> 12The Council' s approval of this signage is also based on the receipt <br /> 13during the meeting of a signed statement from the Apache Plaza management <br /> 14that they will request no further signage on the center' s pylon sign. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 - Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 17 <br /> 18Council Decision on Evanson Request for Subdivision Without Platting for <br /> 193512 Silver Lake Road Laid Over Until June 3rd Council Meeting . <br /> 20 <br /> 21Application: for approval of the grading plan and final plat of the <br /> 22 above four unit subdivision located in Gardena Acres in <br /> 23 the 3500 blocks of Silver Lake Road and Belden Drive, <br /> 24 which the applicant stated, had been revised in accord- <br /> 25 ance with directions he had been given during the May - <br /> 26 19th hearing on his request to subdivide without plat- <br /> 27 ting. <br /> •28 <br /> 29Madden' s indicated the two civil engineers on the Planning <br /> 30Report: Commission tended to get quite technical concerning <br /> 31 matters which related to surveys, boundaries, plats, <br /> 32 etc. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 said an example of this had been the Commissioners' <br /> 35 request that contour lines to designate how the pro <br /> 36 perty would slope, particularly towards the Larwick <br /> 37 property to the northeast facing Silver Lake Road; <br /> 38 <br /> 39 did not perceive that information had been provided in <br /> 40 the revised grading plan Mr. Evanson had presented that <br /> 41 evening; <br /> 42 <br /> 43 told the property owner he was not asking for a survey <br /> 44 of the Larwick lot but rather that contour lines denote <br /> 45 just how Mr. Evanson planned to get from an elevation <br /> 46 of 1 ,012 on the Silver Lake Road side to an elevation <br /> 47 of 1 ,016 or 1,018 on the northeastern parcel. <br /> 48 <br /> 49Proponent: David G. Evanson, 2208 - 73rd Avenue North, Brooklyn <br /> 50 Park, MN <br /> 51 <br /> 52 *Mr. Evanson told the Commission representative that <br /> • 53 part of his property was relatively level and he and <br /> 54 his surveyor had agreed it would not be necessary to <br />