Laserfiche WebLink
1 -5- <br /> • 2 <br /> 3 show what would in all probability be "only a tempor- <br /> 4 ary arrangement, particularly if Mr. Larwick decides to <br /> 5 grade his parcel prior to the development of my pro- <br /> 6 perty. " ; <br /> 7 <br /> 8 *stated the reason no contour lines had been drawn <br /> 9 between Mr. Forsberg' s property on Belden Drive and <br /> 10 Mr. Larwick' s property had been because there was only <br /> 11 a two foot differential in grade between those proper- <br /> 12 ties; <br /> 13 <br /> 14 *indicated that he talked to Mr. Larwick but had been <br /> 15 unable to get a slope easement from him because his <br /> 16 copy of the minutes requiring that easement had only <br /> 17 reached him that afternoon; <br /> 18 <br /> 19 *disputed the minutes' reference to a motion requirement <br /> 20 for "1 to 2 feet on the lot, except at the northeast <br /> 21 property line" , saying his notes had shown only a 3 <br /> 22 foot requirement within the final grades had been dis- <br /> 23 cussed with 5 feet at the northeast property line; <br /> 24 <br /> 25 *stated he believed the 5 feet would be within the <br /> 26 Larwick parcel. <br /> 27 <br /> •28Councilmember Enrooth asked Mr. Evanson whether delaying a decision to <br /> 29the Council' s June 23rd meeting would be a real problem for him. The <br /> 30property owner said that would probably be no problem because he had been <br /> 31unsuccessful in finding one person or contractor who would be willing to <br /> 32take all the dirt at once. However, he said he was concerned that "every <br /> 33time I 've come back, having met all requirements, there' s another <br /> 34condition imposed on my request being approved. " <br /> 35 <br /> 36Councilmember Enrooth responded that he was not suggesting additional <br /> 37conditions but rather only that the Councilmembers and staff might need <br /> 38more time to digest and fully understand the plans which had only been <br /> 39presented that evening. The Councilmember said he personally would need <br /> 40to know specifically how much ground was going to be removed before he <br /> 41could approve the plan. <br /> 42 <br /> 43Mayor Sundland agreed that removing 7 feet of grade to obtain the <br /> 44required slope appeared to be substantial enough to warrant more <br /> 45specifics on just how that transition was going to be made. <br /> 46 <br /> 47Mr. Evanson told him there was an existing 10 foot transition along Mr. <br /> 48Forsberg' s side of the property and a 5 foot easement from Mr. Larwick <br /> 49would leave only a 2 foot differential to be graded even if the grading <br /> 50were started immediately. <br /> 51 <br /> 52Staff Report: Mr. Childs indicated he would check the tape of the <br /> •53 hearing minutes to clarify the disputed motion, but <br /> 54 <br />