My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 09221987
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1987
>
CC MINUTES 09221987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:47:19 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:47:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1987
SP Name
CC MINUTES 09221987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1 Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve two payments of <br /> 2 $1 ,825 . 00 to the Edward J. Hance law firm for prosecution services <br /> 3 from July 2 through September 2 , 1987. <br /> 4 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 5 Stonehouse Contractor to be Paid <br /> 6 Mr. Childs said he perceived the contractor had made some progress on <br /> 7 the Stonehouse and recommended the August payment, which covered <br /> 8 work which the contractor had completed, be paid at this time. The <br /> 9 Manager indicated that he perceived for the Council to further delay <br /> 10 payment might make the situation worse rather than better. <br /> 11 Council Action <br /> 12 Motion by Makowske, seconded by Ranallo to approve payment of. <br /> 13 $30 , 970.00 to Fullerton Lumber for work on the Stonehouse addition <br /> 14 during August, 1987 . <br /> 15 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 16 REPORTS <br /> 17 SEPTEMBER 15 , 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - STEVE LONDON <br /> a8 Council Authorizes Ordinance Amendment for Second Caretaker Unit in <br /> 19 Mini-Warehouse Facility <br /> 20 Application: from Ken Solie and Jerry Cowan, partners in Village <br /> 21 Properties, 2916 Pentagon Drive to amend the City <br /> 22 Zoning Ordinance as it relates to mini-warehouse <br /> 23 facilities in a Light Industrial District to allow <br /> 24 two, rather than one, caretaker units in such <br /> 25 facilities. <br /> 26 Commission London reported the Commissioners had voted 3 to 2 <br /> 27 Recommenda- against changing the Ordinance to allow the second <br /> 28 tion: unit; <br /> 29 said he had agreed with the Chair' s and Commissioner <br /> 30 Werenicz ' perception that there had been no convinc- <br /> 31 ing arguments made to show either an overriding <br /> 32 security or economic need for the second caretaker <br /> 33 unit; <br /> 34 indicated he had also shared the Chair ' s concern <br /> 35 with setting a precedent for allowing living quar- <br /> 36 ters in other City warehouse facilities, although he <br /> 37 had to admit the potential for that happening might <br /> 8 have been "a little vague" ; <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.