My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 04231996
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1996
>
CC MINUTES 04231996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:00:08 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:00:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1996
SP Name
CC MINUTES 04231996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> • April 23, 1996 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS. <br /> 2 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to approve the following claims: <br /> 3 A. Foster, Ojile. Wentzell & Brever, LLC in the amount of$2,600.00 for professional <br /> 4 services rendered for the month of April, 1996. <br /> 5 B. 4 pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director. <br /> 6 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 7 VII. REPORTS. <br /> 8 A. Planning Commission Meeting- April 16. 1996. <br /> 9 1. Variance Request for Lots 8 and 10 of the Village Commons: 3925-8 and 3925-10 <br /> 10 Fordham Drive,Nedegaard Construction. <br /> 11 Planning Commissioner Gondorchin was present to report on the Planning Commission <br /> 12 meeting of April 16, 1996. He reported Bruce Nedegaard had been present at the meeting <br /> 13 to explain that the location of the hearth rooms of the twin homes located on Lots 8-and <br /> 14 10 of the Village Commons will be in violation of the rear yard setbacks due to a survey <br /> 15 error. The surveyor placed the hearth rooms on the left side of the twin homes when they <br /> 16 should have been located on the right side. After looking at the blueprints and discussing <br /> the issue there was no opposition by the Planning Commission to grant the variance. The <br /> 41 criteria of reasonable use and hardship not being created by the owner were debated as <br /> 19 the units could be used as originally intended without the hearth room and the surveyor <br /> 20 was under the owner's employment when he made the error. Chair Bergstrom then noted <br /> 21 that granting the variance would not be setting a precedent nor would it negatively affect <br /> 22 the community. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval <br /> 23 of the nine foot variance request for the Village Commons,Nedegaard Construction, as <br /> 24 presented, based on meeting the three criteria for variance and that the neighbors voiced <br /> 25 no concern. <br /> 26 Councilmember Marks noted that Lots 7 and 8 and Lots 9 and 10 were mirror images of <br /> 27 each other and asked if the hearth room could be moved into the easement closer to the <br /> 28 lot line to minimize or eliminate the need for a variance. <br /> 29 Bruce Nedegaard,Nedegaard Construction explained the original plan placed the hearth <br /> 30 room out over the master bedroom. He provided the original plan the surveyor had <br /> 31 worked from noting he had been unaware that the surveyor had this plan. He stated that <br /> 32 ultimately no one was at fault but himself because the surveyor was under his direction. <br /> 33 He provided the Councilmembers with an illustration of the preliminary plat versus the <br /> 34 final plat, noting the angle of the twin home on Lot 10 had been changed to save a six to <br /> 35 seven foot stand of 30 foot evergreen trees. <br /> Mayor Ranallo reported a letter had been received since the Planning Commission <br /> 37 meeting from Halbert Rogers, 4011 Fordham Drive. The letter stated he was not trying to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.