Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> • January 27, 1998 <br /> Page 16 <br /> 1 program for flood proofing could be done if it is done for the entire community and it is shown <br /> 2 that it will benefit the entire community. <br /> 3 Mr. Nelson suggested the City should not have such a complicated program. The City's role <br /> 4 should stick strictly with repairs to the street, holding ponds, and infrastructure. <br /> 5 Roy Genaw, 3404 Roosevelt Street NE, stated he felt the increase in the Storm Water Utility Fee <br /> 6 should be based on a square footage basis. He questioned the proposed increase to commercial <br /> 7 properties of 2.5%. He objected to paying the increase in the fee. <br /> 8 Cavanaugh stated there was an inequity in the fee when it was $3 per quarter. When the original <br /> 9 ordinance was passed it was.decided that it should be a flat fee per lot due to the complexity of <br /> 10 determining the fee on a square foot basis. <br /> 11 Mayor Ranallo stated he agreed with Mr. Genaw. He objected to a person with a lower value <br /> 12 home paying the same fee as a resident with a higher valued home. <br /> 13 Mr. Genaw stated he agreed that Mayor Ranallo objected but not on the same basis. <br /> Cavanaugh stated the issue was complex. He stated he owns a large lot but his lot holds the <br /> 4k water rather than contributing to the run off situation. He stated the City does have a specific <br /> 16 plan provided by WSB. The flood proofing will only be provided to residents who can <br /> 17 demonstrate they are receiving public water. <br /> 18 Faust noted that an increase in the Fee to $52 per year will only pay for 25% of the costs of the <br /> 19 improvements. This will demonstrate however, that St. Anthony is willing to shoulder their <br /> 20 share of the cost. The City of St. Anthony does not know how the improvements will be funded <br /> 21 if they do not receive funds from other sources. The proposed package has been developed with <br /> 22 outside experts and forces and the City feels that it is a good plan. <br /> 23 Mr. Nelson stated the ordinance should contain a cap after 15 years. <br /> 24 Faust stated this ordinance does include a natural sunset. There is a certain trust and confidence <br /> 25 in the elected officials and electorate that the Council will spend their money wisely. The <br /> 26 ordinance needs to be left open ended so that future Councils are able to make their own <br /> 27 decisions. He stated there are too many variables involved to calculate the Storm Water Utility <br /> 28 Fee on a square foot basis. The option has been discussed by the Storm Water Task Force and is <br /> 29 not feasible. <br /> 30 Thuesen stated there are too many factors involved to determine the Storm Water Utility Fee on a <br /> square footage basis. The Council bas no great pleasure in increasing the fee but needs to <br /> increase the fee to show a good faith effort in order to obtain grant money. The Council will not <br /> 33 extend the increase any longer than they have to. <br />