My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 08101999
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1999
>
CC MINUTES 08101999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:47:06 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:47:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1999
SP Name
CC MINUTES 08101999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes <br /> August 10, 1999 <br /> • Page 5 <br /> 1 Cavanaugh asked for clarification regarding landscaping along 29'Avenue. Mr. Hubmer <br /> 2 referred to the plan, which provided for boulevard trees by the chokers and reducers. <br /> 3 Cavanaugh wished to recommend decorative lighting along 29'Avenue and St. Anthony <br /> 4 Boulevard. He felt that lighting would not only improve any safety concerns from residents, but <br /> 5 would also soften the residential area. <br /> 6 Mr. Hubmer reminded the Council that decorative lighting would not be covered by municipal <br /> 7 funds unless it was determined that the lighting was a requirement. Marks suggested this topic <br /> 8 be resolved at a later time. <br /> 9 Julie Kimbllin, 2705 291 Avenue NE, stated she had attended the public hearing on July 27, <br /> 10 1999, but wished to express her concerns to the Council. She stated she had organized a petition <br /> 11 containing 81 signatures in opposition to the proposed sidewalks and such petition would be filed <br /> 12 with the Council. In addition, she was disappointed that she had been unaware until recently of a <br /> 13 "Community Plan" that included sidewalks. Ms. Kimbllin stated that it was the residents' belief <br /> 14 that sidewalks were not necessary and could decrease property values. She commended Mr. <br /> 15 Hubmer for his representation of the issues at the public hearing. Ms. Kimbllin wished to clarify <br /> that the recommendations from WSB suggest that if a sidewalk were implemented, it should be <br /> 40 placed on the south side of the street. However, she wanted to clarify that the residents at the <br /> 18 meeting strongly opposed any sidewalks at all. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Ms. Kimbllin did not feel that a stop sign was needed at every corner, but possibly a stop sign <br /> 21 towards the middle would be more appropriate. Ms. Kimbllin questioned whether the <br /> 22 homeowners would incur the cost of the proposed decorative lighting mentioned by Cavanaugh. <br /> 23 Marks thanked Ms. Kimbllin for her input and provided a response to her concern about a Com- <br /> 24 munity Plan. Marks stated that a Comprehensive Plan was put together years ago, and that hear- <br /> 25 ings were held and the entire community was invited to speak. <br /> 26 Faust clarified that the Comprehensive Plan is considered the "blueprint for the future" and that <br /> 27 every city has such a plan. Faust stated that the City encouraged community involvement and he <br /> 28 would invite residents to view the Comprehensive Plan on file with the City. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Thuesen asked the Council if it would be possible to determine if property values would fluctuate <br /> 31 due to the addition of sidewalks. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Marks stated that sidewalks were installed on the street in which he lived after he moved to St. <br /> 34 Anthony. He further stated that conditional litter attributed towards sidewalks was not noticed <br /> 5 nor were any feelings of invasion of privacy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.