Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Minutes <br /> August 10, 1999 <br /> • Page 6 <br /> l Cavanaugh stated that making the transition to sidewalks is understandably difficult. On the <br /> 2 other hand, he believes that sidewalks are beneficial and that residents are not aware that some of <br /> 3 the property to be utilized for sidewalks is considered public property. Cavanaugh feels that the <br /> 4 character along 29" Avenue could be improved by adding sidewalks and decorative lighting. <br /> 5 Cavanaugh clarified that he would prefer buried cables for the decorative lighting. In retrospect, <br /> 6 Cavanaugh stated that the intent of the proposed project is to solve the storm water problem and <br /> 7 he would not support any insistence on sidewalks. He stated, however,that from a safety <br /> 8 prospective,sidewalks, decorative lighting, and landscaping could have a calming effect on the <br /> 9 neighborhood. <br /> 10 Martha Johnson, 2816 29`h Avenue, stated that she believes that lot size is not being considered <br /> 11 in relation to sidewalks. She requested that the Council considered the possibility of decreased <br /> 12 property values upon installation of sidewalks due to reduction of lot size. <br /> 13 Richard Perrin, 3217 29'Avenue, stated he had resided in St. Anthony since he was three years <br /> 14 old and has lived on 291h Avenue for 13 years. He confirmed that the residents are opposed to <br /> 15 sidewalks, except around park areas. He concluded that, after measuring the lot for his home, a <br /> 16 sidewalk, if implemented, would be approximately 20 feet from his front door. <br /> 40 Mr. Perrin offered that many residents feel a safer street could be accomplished by a stronger <br /> 19 police presence in the area. He stated that most of the children who wait for the school buses <br /> 20 wait in their own driveways or a driveway close by their home, and the absence of sidewalks has <br /> 21 not been a concern. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Mr. Perrin questioned if the proposed reconnection fee to homeowners of$400 is a guaranteed <br /> 24 figure. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Marks asked City Manager Mike Morrison to respond. Morrison stated residents would be <br /> 27 assessed a water reconnection fee of$400.00, and he then reviewed the process of obtaining <br /> 28 MSA funds for the balance of the street reconstruction. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Marks reassured Mr. Perrin that homeowners would not be assessed charges, other than the <br /> 31 reconnection fee, due to the street reconstruction. Cavanaugh disagreed that assurances could be <br /> 32 given as MSA funds have not been received. Faust clarified that the reconstruction would not <br /> 33 occur until MSA funds have been received. Cavanaugh expressed concern that MSA funds <br /> 34 would not be approved because such funds were not mentioned in the original plan from the task <br /> 35 force. <br /> 36 Morrison stated that the City had raised storm sewer rates in previous years to help solve the <br /> flooding problem. He further clarified that MSA funding was not in the original plan from the <br /> 16 task force because the firm of WSB was originally hired to solve the flooding problem and not to <br /> 39 reconstruct the streets. The policy has been redirected to include the extension of the project. <br />