Laserfiche WebLink
® 3 <br /> 1 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Motion by Enrooth , seconded by Makowske , to approve payment <br /> 4 of $19, 627 . 86 to Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for <br /> 5 December sewer service charges . <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Motion by Marks , seconded by Ranallo, to approve payment of <br /> 10 $150 , 000 to Ramsey County in reimbursement of funds received <br /> 11 for temporary filtration plant . <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 REPORTS <br /> 17 <br /> 18 PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 21 , 1989 <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo introduced Commissioner Ted Brownell , <br /> 21 representing the Planning Commission. Commissioner Brownell <br /> 22 announced that Commissioner. Steve London had resigned the <br /> • 23 Planning Commission, and that Chairman Madden had expressed , <br /> 24 on behalf of the entire Commission, his thanks for London ' s <br /> 25 vears of service and his wishes for London ' s success in his <br /> 26 future endeavors . <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Commissioner Brownell reported that the Planning Commission <br /> 29 had received two sign variance requests , the first of which <br /> 30 was by Stan Carlson . owner of Rosie ' s Restaurant located at <br /> 31 2905 Kenzie Terrace . Stan Carlson of Rosie ' s Restaurant and <br /> 32 Michael McKee of McKee Sign Service were present . The <br /> 33 request was for a second sign approximately 30 square feet <br /> 34 in size which would be mounted on the parapet on the top of <br /> 35 the roof of the building . This second sign would be <br /> 36 identical to the first sign allowed by the sign ordinance . <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Brownell indicated that the Planning Commission recommended <br /> 39 approval of the request, noting that the two signs would <br /> 40 total 60 square feet , well under the 110 square feet allowed <br /> 41 by the sign ordinance; that the request met the three <br /> 42 requirements of the Minnesota statutes; that the location is <br /> 43 unique because the building fronts on two thoroughfares and <br /> 44 because the building is situated at an angle on the <br /> 45 property; and -that no one spoke against the variance <br /> 46 request . <br /> 47 <br /> 48 The Planning Commission also recommended that all other sign <br /> • 49 variances granted to this property be cancelled upon the <br /> 50 authorization of the' pending request; that the variance <br />