My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10231990
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990
>
CC PACKET 10231990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:09:13 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:09:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 10231990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
®An effective The service delivery process focuses on the • Being visible in the community <br /> actual delivery of services to citizens. The pri- • Representing the community <br /> community is mary players are local government employees • Professional development <br /> one in which the and contractors. Most systems do not distin- • Setting the tone for the organization <br /> guish between the two but focus rather on the • Creating a "local team spirit" <br /> governance, action. Service process employees have the <br /> management, following functions: The diagram below illustrates this concept. <br /> and service To help gain perspective on what portion of <br /> To provide services to citizens that reflect your time is spent in each of the following <br /> delivery the city's values roles, fill in the blanks indicated by the per- <br /> processes • To provide feedback to managers about the centage signs: <br /> are community <br /> linked.m • To monitor performance in service delivery <br /> The actions taken by individuals providing Doer Supervisor Manager Leader <br /> services are the most visible. These service <br /> delivery actions are compared by citizens <br /> with their actual desires. <br /> In the 1980s a shift appear to be occurring Immediate o f Long-Term <br /> in the relationship between the three key pro- <br /> cesses. Individuals and communities are rec- Hands On — Abstract <br /> ognizing the partnership between policy lead- <br /> ers, managers, and employees/contractors; Power Over Power Over <br /> they are becoming increasingly aware of the Task Others <br /> interdependence among the processes of rngov- 0% percentage of Time 100% <br /> eance, management, and service delivery. <br /> Each local government strikes its own bal- <br /> ance in the relationships of these processes. <br /> A clear understanding of the manager's <br /> Diverse Roles of the Manager role in the local government organization is <br /> vitally important. This should include deci- <br /> DOER: Doing the Task Yourself sion-making parameters and boundaries, as <br /> well as clearly outlined expectations and Stan- <br /> • Responding to complaints dards to guide daily performance within the <br /> • Handling problems organization. The key to successfully evaluat- <br /> • Providing information and analysis ing performance is defining (prior to the eval- <br /> • Developing budget uation) what criteria you will use to evaluate <br /> • Preparing agenda the individual. <br /> SUPERVISOR: Getting the Task Done Learning Point#2: Define the Evaluation <br /> Through Others Elements of Task Performance <br /> • Hiring, firing, and promoting staff The development of the local government <br /> • Monitoring performance and making ad- manager evaluation process requires prepara- <br /> justments tory. work by the mayor and the council in <br /> • Providing direction conjunction with the manager. The past <br /> • Interpreting council goals and directives year's performance can be evaluated from <br /> • Counseling staff on problems two perspectives: <br /> MANAGER: Developing Processes and Performance Objectives: <br /> the Organization What is to be accomplished <br /> • Anticipating issues Performance Standards: <br /> • Developing processes for handling issues How it is to be accomplished <br /> • Developing management policies, proce- <br /> dures, and systems Defining specific expectations for each of <br /> • Building the management team these two elements of performance should be <br /> • Building the capacity of employees through done ideally at the time the manager is hired, <br /> training or at the beginning of the evaluation period; <br /> however, this is often not the case. At a mini- <br /> LEADER: Setting Direction and Creating mum, performance objectives and perfor- <br /> "Local Team Spirit" mance standards should be clearly defined <br /> before any evaluative statements or com- <br /> e Empowering others to act ments are made. <br /> 6 PM February 1988 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.