Laserfiche WebLink
1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 <br /> PAGE 7 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Motion by Franzese, second by Madden to set aside this issue <br /> 7 and put back on the agenda when the Planning Commission can <br /> 8 meet with Bill Soth, the City Attorney. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> 14 E. Proposed Planning Commission BY-Laws <br /> 15 <br /> 16 The third draft of the proposed by-laws for the Planning <br /> 17 Commission were included in the agenda packet . <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Commissioner Madden noted he was not present at the meeting <br /> 20 where the by-laws were first discussed. He inquired where the <br /> 21 need for the by-laws was initiated . <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Chai..rperson Faust had suggested by-laws be drafted by staff <br /> 24 and viewed them as providing some guidelines and standard <br /> 25 operating procedures . <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Commissioner Madden held the opinion that by-laws were not <br /> needed. He suggested rather than using "Chair" and "Vice <br /> Chair" in the by-laws that "Chairperson" would be more gender <br /> 30 correct . <br /> 31 <br /> 32 The by-laws were reviewed line by line with the following <br /> 33 ' corrections, deletions and addi.tions : : <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Section CA) Delete ( 3) and (4 ) and renumber ( 5) to ( 3 ) <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Section 6 was changed to read as follows :. "Four members of <br /> 38 the commission shall constitute a quorum for the transaction <br /> 39 of business . " <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Section 9 should be included in Section 8 and all of the <br /> 42 following sections should be renumbered. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Section 11 (6 ) should read as follows : "Planning Commission <br /> 45 asks any questions it may have of the proponents , opponents, <br /> 46 or staff , and then takes action in accordance with Robert ' s <br /> 47 Rules of Order. " <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Section 15 should be eliminated in its entirety. <br /> 50 <br /> • <br />