My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08142001
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2001
>
CC PACKET 08142001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:53:31 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 08142001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: July 31, 2001 <br /> TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager <br /> FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director <br /> ITEM: CENTRAL PARK.RENOVATIONMUNDING <br /> The current financial plan for Central Park improvements totaled $1.6 million dollars. <br /> Sources of funding included: <br /> $ 625,000 G.O. Tax Abatement Bonds <br /> $ 250,000 General Fund Reserves <br /> $ 725,000 Water Filtration Funds <br /> $1,600,000 <br /> The original plan for redevelopment of Central Park has changed and upgraded to <br /> include: park buildings enhancements, bathroom additions to Water Tower Park and <br /> other environmental improvements, which require that additional resources of$700,000 <br /> be identified to fund the project. <br /> Option#1 <br /> Selling additional tax abatement bonds could create the additional funds needed to <br /> complete the park improvements. The maximum levy that St. Anthony can abate totals <br /> $100,000. When issuing the 2001 G.O. Tax Abatement Bonds, the annual tax abatement <br /> levy totaled$30,000, leaving an additional $70,000 for future abatement. <br /> Option#2 <br /> Another option of funding would include the appointment of additional reserves from <br /> several sources. They include: designate an additional $275, 000 of the water filtration <br /> funds, transfer 2000 water filtration interest earnings totaling$200,000 to the parks and <br /> using $225,000 of the HRA Projects Fund (analysis is attached). <br /> Either option would work; however, the least impact on property taxes would clearly be <br /> Option #2. My recommendation is for Council to approve the revised park funding <br /> proposal at a cost not to exceed$2.3 million dollars. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.