Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> When Councilmember Makowske asked how the assessed valuations had been figured " <br /> • Mr. Childs told her they had been taken from Dick Krier's estimations, and the-Manager <br /> indicated that although he was comfortable with the H.R.A. Planning Consultant's <br /> estimated acquisition costs, he questioned whether the relocation costs might now be <br /> higher. <br /> .Mr. Soth .affirmed that the bonds could be sold and the money' invested until they had <br /> to be paid off, ' but,. he added, the $100.,000 administrative and legal expenses might <br /> be at risk. Mr.. Gilligan suggested instead, that an early call could lock in the low <br /> interest rates and bail out the issue. <br /> Commissioner Jones indicated hi.s concern that the same. amenities and maintenance be <br /> .provided with .the rental. pr.oject as. had been proposed for the condominiums, saying <br /> he perceived the rents would have to be structured to make the project viable. He <br /> also wondered whether -the developers had taken into considerationthe possibility <br /> that the government might be changing the. tax -incentives which make -rentals desirable. <br /> Mr. Brinkman said,_that since the original Kenzie Terrace project had been approved, - <br /> three years ago, there had been _a _drastic .change in the .senior housing market, with <br /> studies now showing that 70% of .the seniors preferred rentals and only. 30% continuing <br /> to buy condominiums. He said he perceived the reasoning behind this was that a senior <br /> couple could take advantage of the.one time exemption granted them. on the sale of their <br /> home and by investing that equity could almost pay the rental cost from the interest <br /> on their investment. The developer said he perceived that by going_ to rental , the <br /> City .would still be achieving its original goal to provide housing to keep their <br /> senior residents at the same time the properties left behind by the seniors would <br /> • be opened to the younger family .market. The Manager added that the total assessed <br /> valuation for 300 rentals would be almost exactly the same as for 300 condominiums. <br /> Commissioner Jones said he could agree with those assumptions, but was still concerned <br /> that the. same quality would be provided with the new project because his own limited <br /> experience with renting to seniors had been that they expected to have the same <br /> quality and maintenance in'rental that they had enjoyed in their own homes. When he <br /> put forth.the example of the Sons of Norway conversion of the old West High School <br /> building as a project which he believed was now oversold because of its quality, Mr. <br /> Yurick said he knew for a. f act that the project was only 40% sold to a great extent <br /> because some of the persons who had initially been very enthused about the, project <br /> had changed their minds when they actually saw the area they would be living in. <br /> Mr. Childs told Commissioner Jones he believed the original study of the redevelopment <br /> of the subject had only considered occupancy, by empty -nesters-..and young professionals <br /> and never young families, because of the land size constraints. <br /> Mayor Sundland indicated all the studies he had seen related to current demograhics <br /> certainly supported the assumption that more seniors were now opting to rent rather <br /> than to reinvest their home equity in another form of home ownership, but he hoped <br /> the lapse in time between the Kenzington and this project-would result in the other <br /> 30% buying 'a condominium in the Kenzington first. <br /> Councilmember'.Ranallo indicated he wanted anyone who might ask why the City wasn't <br /> considering townhomes or single family residences in the redevelopment project to <br /> understand that with a 1 .8 million dollar project to be built on only six and a half <br /> • acres, the land under the townhome units alone would probably cost close to $65,000 <br /> per unit, when many residents have indicated to him that they perceived $40,000 per <br /> lot was too high for single family residences being built on -the Johnson property. <br />