My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 11111985
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
1985
>
CC WORKSESSION 11111985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:56:29 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:56:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1985
SP Name
CC WORKSESSION 11111985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-4- <br /> Commissioner Jones commented that to squeeze townhomes or single family residences <br /> • into that site would certainly result in the loss of all the amenities such as land- <br /> scaping and water areas planned for this project, which he would personally vigorously <br /> oppose. <br /> The proposed plans for the new rental project were displayed side by side with the <br /> plans for the original condominium and Mr. Tushie pointed out that the two buildings <br /> would retain the original five and eight story heights. Each building would be <br /> constructed with 150 units and an enclosed level of parking under each building with <br /> a ratio of .9 spaces provided per unit. This .project would also satisfy what is <br /> perceived to be a senior preference, to live above grade, and would provide more <br /> parking than is .normally needed for senior housing but which, the architect said, <br /> St. Anthony buyers seem to prefer. <br /> The developers had added 33,000 square foot of resident-geared commercial space to <br /> the new proposal and Mr. Tushie indicated he perceived the parking which had been <br /> provided for in front of the building should be more than adequate to provide for <br /> the overflow and the commercial . <br /> The architect pointed out the grassy areas which had been retained with this proposal <br /> and said the amenities included the retention of the original water features with some <br /> relocation of the holding pond. He said he believed the plans from a conceppual <br /> and site standpoint had been really well laid out to leave lots of open space and <br /> still permit all the activities which were proposed. <br /> Commissioner Madden expressed his concerns about the inclusion of commercial in the <br /> • building, recalling that the original goal of the Kenzie Terrace Study group, of <br /> which he had been a member, had been to eliminate what was then perceived to be <br /> unneeded commercial space in this area so the remaining commercial could be upgraded <br /> to a viable shopping center. <br /> Mr. Tushie pointed out that the area occupied by the City-';s liquor operation alone <br /> nearly 20,000 square feet and indicated the 33,000 square feet of commercial to be <br /> added to this project would be geared to only serving the residents in the apartments <br /> and not towards the displacement of businesses in the other shopping center. He <br /> said a market rate restaurant might be most appropriate in -that space since the <br /> planners had learned from other projects they have been involved in, that seniors <br /> seem to prefer restaurant rather than a cafeteria type atmosphere in their community <br /> spaces. In the Woodlake project Arkell is just completing in Richfield, the pro- <br /> spective buyers have indicated they would consider the roof plaz4, the developers <br /> have been able to provide, as their own little gathering area and, Mr. Tushie said, <br /> a visit to Woodlake Point, which is 52% sold out, should indicate something about <br /> the quality and lifestyle the developers are capable of providing. <br /> Councilmember Ranallo said he saw the necessity for the developers to mount a good <br /> reselling of the new project to the original Kenzie Terrace Task Force, especially to <br /> convince them that the proposed commercial would not be competing with the existing <br /> businesses in the adjacent shopping area. Councilmember Enrooth suggested aggressive <br /> merchants from that area would probably be vying to move to this project. Commissioner <br /> Madden said it would probably be correct to assume that with all the new people living <br /> in the project, merchants would be attracted to the new commercial area, but he was <br /> still skeptical about the reaction to creating a new shopping center to compete with <br /> • the adjacent one which now has so many empty stores. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.