My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 10081962
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1962
>
PL MINUTES 10081962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:23:43 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:23:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES 1962-1966
SP Name
PL MINUTES 10081962
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. ....•..ren-.a.w 1 R <br /> Minutes of Planning Board Meeting Oct. 8, 1962 <br /> 1 . Meeting opened at 7:15 P.M. <br /> 2. Members attending: <br /> 1.. Cavanaugh J. Rosinek <br /> R. Dougherty A. Skovran <br /> E. Rocks <br /> 3. Hearing on rezoning of area between 37th Ave.N.E. and Soo Line Tracks, <br /> from Silver Lake Road to Higherest <br /> The hearing was attended by approximately 20 property owners. Present <br /> i <br /> zoning of the area was presented by the Planning Board, with an explana- <br /> tion of how the zoning was established. No objections were presented to <br /> the zoning west of the east 150 feet of those lots lying along the west <br /> i <br /> • side of Foss Road and along the Soo Line tracks. The area in controversy _ <br /> includes the east 150 feet of block 11 and all of block 12 in Moundsview <br /> Acres Second Addition. <br /> The property owners initially were divided between maintaining the present <br /> zoning and changing the zoning to multiple dwelling and light industrial. . <br /> One group of petitioners representing a considerable portion of the pro- <br /> perty owners in the area favored rezoning all but the northerly four lots <br /> of each block to multiple d 91lings. Since it would not be economically j <br /> feasible to 'c-ep the present zoning on the raaaining lots, it would ap- <br /> pear Wat these would have to be rezoned to either light industrial or I <br /> multiple dwelling use. <br /> Another alternative considered is to rezone the property extending from <br /> I <br /> the ext.ehsio" of the village maintenance building south property line to <br /> 3'7f6 Ave, N. E. to M+ulti.l,le dwelling, with the remainder light industrial. <br /> It appeared that aii of the -operty owners present were agreeable to eith- <br /> er of these proposals at the conclusion of the hearing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.