My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 10081962
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1962
>
PL MINUTES 10081962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:23:43 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:23:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES 1962-1966
SP Name
PL MINUTES 10081962
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Planning Board closed the hearing at. 9:30 P.M. Consideration of the <br /> rezoning was taken up by the board. One major factor in the rezoning ap- <br /> pears to be the future glans for a holding pond on the north end of block <br /> 12. The board requests that information be provided by the village engin- <br /> eers on the possibility of the present village property being either ex- <br /> panded or reduced. Another factor which must be considered is the effect ' <br /> OK adjacent undeveloped property presently zoned R-1 residential. The <br /> board will consider this rezoning_at the Oct._ 15 regular meeting, assum- <br /> ing that information from the village engineers is available at that time. <br /> 4. Request of M. Stenglein for Rezoning of Lots 5 and 6, Block 7, Moundsview <br /> Acres Second Addition <br /> Mr. Stenglein appeared to request a change in zoning from multiple dwelling <br /> to light industrial use to permit erection of a warehouse type building on <br /> • the property. The property was recommended to the council for multiple <br /> dwegzoning in the general rezoning action last May. The reason for <br /> this recommendation was information from the Ramsey County engineers of- <br /> fice that access near the north end of the railroad overpass on the north- <br /> bound lane of Silver Lake Road would have to be restricted because of poor <br /> traffic visibility due to the grades. -.If access to this property would <br /> have to be obtained from Macalaster Drive, it appeared to the Planning <br /> Board that it was more desirable to have passenger car traffic through the <br /> residential area adjacent to the property than the truck traffic which <br /> would be generated by a light industrial use of the property. -_ <br /> It was suggested to Mr. Stenglein that he contact the county engineers of- <br /> fice regarding access to his property from Silver Lake Road and get a def- <br /> inite answer from them. He agreed to this a:.: .'Lon and will also submit <br /> • plans showing location of the proposed building on his property, parking <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.