Laserfiche WebLink
THE REASONS FOR SUGGESTING THAT THE EAST HALF OF BLOCK 12 SHOULD ONLY BE <br /> REZONED TO TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES INSTEAD OF MULTIPLE DWELLING OR LIGHT IN- <br /> DUSTRIAL ARE: <br /> 1 . AN EASEMENT FOR A STANDARD OIL PIPELINE IS LOCATED SOMEWHERE WITHIN <br /> THE EAST HALF OF BLOCK 12. VILLAGE RECORDS WHICH HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE <br /> TO US ARE NOT SPECIFIC EITHER AS TO THE LOCATION OF THIS PIPELINE OR <br /> THE WIDTH OF THE EASEMENT BUT IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THERE IS SERIOUS <br /> QUESTION IF THIS EASEMENT WOULD PERMIT ANY USES MORE INTENSIVE THAN TWO <br /> FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. <br /> 2. TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WOULD ACT AS A BUFFER BETWEEN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. <br /> AND MULTIPLE DWELLING USES IN THE WEST HALF OF BLOCK 12 AND THE RESIDEN- <br /> TIAL AREA ACROSS HIGHCREST ROAD IN NEW BRIGHTON. <br /> 2. PLAN FOR LIBRARY: <br /> THE INFORMATION FURNISHED TO THE PLANNING BOARD IS NOT ADEQUATE TO MAKE A <br /> SOUND RECOMMENDATION. IN STUDYING THE PROPOSED BUILDING PLAN IN RELATION TO THE <br /> PRESENT BUILDINGS AND PARKING LOT, IT IS APPARENT. THAT TRAFFIC FLOW IN AND OUT OF <br /> THE SHOPPING CENTER WILL BE AFFECTED. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO A NEW <br /> LOCATION FOR THE FREE-STANDING SHOPPING CENTER SIGN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS <br /> NEEDED ON TRAFFIC FLOW AND PARKING PROVISIONS. <br /> AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, WITH A FREE-STANDING BUILDING <br /> ;N THE PRESENT PARKING LOT, POSSIBLE BEHIND THE PRESENT FILLING STATION OR DAIRY <br /> QUEEN STORE. THIS LOCATION WOULD NOT GREATLY AFFECT TRAFFIC, AND ADEQUATE PARKING <br /> FACILITIES COULD BE PROVIDED AROUND THE LIBRARY. <br /> THE BUILDING PROPOSED • IN THE PLANS AS SUBMITTED, IF IT WERE TO BE LOCATED <br /> AS PROPOSED, SHOULD BE FINISHED IN BRICK ON ALL SIDES. SIMILARLY, A FREE STANDING <br /> BUILDING SHOULD BE ALL BRICK. <br /> • <br />