PL MINUTES 06151964 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3 Planning Board Minut June 15, 1964 8. Richard Dobis presented a proposed division of the property described as follaws: Comssmncing at a point in the td line of the E 2/5 of the 0k of the NY-4 • of tin SO4 distance 358 52/1001 S front the %1W corner thereof, th. E 1741 th. N 60 395/10001 th. E. 44 45/iG01 th. S. 301 th. E 44 45/1001 th. S. to the S line 01 the E 2/5 o tthe NI-2 of 102c NVk, of the S:4 th. W. 262 9/101 to t;je Std corner thereof th. N. to beginning, Part of Section 6, Tc,,:znship 29, RanSe 23. The proposed division would result in 8 lots measuring 661 M 132'x', Noved by Springer, seconded by Emond to approve ti:e division as follows: Four lots of 66' each ront;ng on 32nd Avenue NE and 3 lots of su► icient F=rontage and area to rimes the requirements of Ordinance #62 fronting on 322 Avenue ME. All in favor. Motion carried. 9. Mr. R. E. Payne of the Minneapolis Star and Tribune presented a request: for surfacing the area around the paper distribution station on 33rd Ave. PIE with crushed rock in place of the formerly specified blacktop. Moved by Errond, seconded by Mesenbring to reaffirm the Planning Board's reco=x- ndation of Noveraber 18th, 1963 and require that the area be surfaced with blacktop as originally specified. All in favor. notion carried. 10. The Bc.rrd examined the proposal by the Diatrond 118" Apartments on 3;:h Ave. INE and Piacalaster Drive to vacate a portion of a 401 sewar easement along the Soo Line Railway and across the Diamond 138" property. The Planning Board recd nds that the Council refer this proposal to the Village Engineer and Attorney for study. The Boards sees no reason why this proposal should not be granted if it does not: • interfere with existing sewer line c ftkhin this easetment. ll. The Board discussed the preperaticn of a plan to be used for the purpose of rezoning t1ha Lemke property from comemrcial to single family residential. The WeRbe{rs feel that: they are not qualified to prepare a proposed layout e; residen-ial streets and lots for this area. Moved by Emend, seconded by Springer to recd. nd that the Council refer this plan to the Engineers for study and that, the Engineers submit to the Planning Board 3 alternate pians for examination. All in favor. Motion carried. 12. Moves! by Springer, seconded by Mesenbring to recomTend that. the Council amend Ordinance #66, Section 6, Sub-division 6C to read as follows: 16 or mor& t�nit apartnnnt - 43,000 sq. feet plus 2750 sq. ft. per each unit over 16. It: is the feeling of the Board that this would el in-inate the Basi rabi 1 i ty of attaching two or m. re buildings into one structure to allow construction of more units on a certain area of land. All in favor. Motion carri?d. Moved by E ond, seconded by Mesenbring to adjourn. •