My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 05201980
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1980
>
PL MINUTES 05201980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:20:13 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:20:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1980
SP Name
PL MINUTES 05201980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> May 20, 1980 <br /> The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bjorklund at 7 :35 P.M. <br /> Present for roll call: Peterson, Jones, Bjorklund, Sopcinski, <br /> Enrooth, and Makowske. <br /> Absent: Bowerman. <br /> Also present: Jim Fornell, City Manager and Ron Berg, Administrative <br /> Assistant <br /> Motion by* Mr. Sopcinski and seconded by Mr. Peterson to approve as <br /> submitted the minutes for the Planning Commission meeting held <br /> April 15 , 1980 . <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Bjorklund will represent the Commission at the Council meeting <br /> scheduled for May 27th. <br /> Mr. Bjorklund opened the public hearing on a rezoning petition by <br /> • David Ames for Lot 12 of the parcel commonly referred to as the <br /> Hedlund PUD at 7 : 45 P.M. <br /> The Manager confirmed that all notification, application, fees, and <br /> publication requirements for such a hearing had been met and Mr. <br /> Djorklund read the. notice. Of the five residents present, no one <br /> reported failure to receive the notice nor objected to its content. <br /> This notice of hearing, as that notice sent in February, included <br /> Lot 11 on which there is an existing vacated, residential dwelling. <br /> Mr. Fornell, however, stated that Lot 11 should not be considered <br /> for rezoning as the developer no' longer intends to develop that <br /> lot for a community building. The Manager saw no legal ramifications <br /> for the inclusion of Lot 11 in the notice especially since the <br /> inclusion of Lot 11, in effect, made the notices more comprehensive <br /> than required. <br /> The repetition of the notice of publication had been necessitated <br /> when the first hearing was tabled at the- request of the petitioner. <br /> because of uncertaintities about the use of tax increment financing. <br /> This type of financing was made necessary when economic conditions <br /> improved to the point where FHA funding became more available. <br /> In an alternative, if Mr. Ames proceeds with Sec. 235 housing, he <br /> will need write down assistance of the land costs of $10 ,000 per <br /> unit for each of the eight assisted owner 235 funded units he pro- <br /> poses. This figure was later verified by the Manager with HUD . and <br /> • the Metropolitan Council as an accurate "ballpark figure" . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.