My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 05201980
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1980
>
PL MINUTES 05201980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:20:13 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:20:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1980
SP Name
PL MINUTES 05201980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> The developer pointed out the advantages to the City with a townhouse <br /> development as contrasted *to rental duplexes permited under City <br /> ordinance. These include closer control of the maintenance of the <br /> whole area through a homeowners ' association; only one driveway for <br /> all the units; and more landscaped area resulting from better place- <br /> ment of the units than would be possible with duplexes. He pointed <br /> out he could have placed three more units on the site under the <br /> ordinance without seeking a variance but had decided to leave a <br /> 36-1/2 'foot backyard setback rather than the 30 feet minimum as <br /> required by ordinance between the buildings and the property line. <br /> This was a concession he was- making after meeting with the residents <br /> on Penrod Lane. It would also permit a better screening of the <br /> parking areas in the rear. <br /> Mr. Fornell told Kathy Cooper, 3908 Macalaster, the PUD will remain <br /> in effect for Lot 11 which can only be developed as R-2 because of <br /> its zoning or "B" service office usage as stipulated in the PUD <br /> agreement, provided the Commission does not recommend its rezoning <br /> at this time. Under the Sec. 235 plan, eight- of the twenty-two ` <br /> townhouse units would be "subsidized" or "owner assisted" under <br /> Section 235 funding. ' How this property is developed will probably <br /> determine what type of usage will be permitted on the properties to <br /> the north of this site, he. told Chester Nelson-, 3916 Macalaster <br /> . Drive. <br /> The zoning to R-3 of the site would apply to any owner of the <br /> property other than Mr. Ames. <br /> Mr. Peterson reported receiving a telephone call from Ruth Thompson,. <br /> who related that she was unable to attend the meeting but wanted to <br /> express her opposition and that of some of her neighbors to the <br /> proposal: She offered no specific reasons for such opposition, <br /> however. <br /> Mr. bjorklund also heard from a resident on Penrod who was adamantly <br /> oppo::aa to changing the PUD or the R-2 zoning nor the property. - -How- <br /> ever, he had also attended a neighborhood gathering at the home of <br /> Dick and Marie Hanson., 4009 Penrod Lane , where the majority of the <br /> persons in attendance liked the idea of "using the land for people <br /> rather than businesses" and only a minority expressed opposition. - <br /> Drol:ping the community building from the plans will probably not be <br /> a major factor since similar facilities are available in the Apache <br /> Mali just across Silver Lake Road, Mrs. Makowske surmised. Mr. <br /> Bjorklund added, present economic conditions are not very favorable <br /> for commercial development as evidenced at Apache. <br /> The hearing was closed at 8-:32 P.M. and recessed at that time for <br /> development of a motion; which was made when the meeting was resumed <br /> • at 8: 26 P.M. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.