Laserfiche WebLink
r 7 <br /> -2- <br /> Mr. Berg reported -the application fee of $.50 had been paid by Sid <br /> Johnson .of NuWay Builders., 1866 Tioga Boulevard-..in New Brighton, <br /> • who proposes to erect a 25 unit townhome development between 3909 <br /> and 4017 Silver Lake Road on what is commonly referred to as the <br /> Hedlund PUD site. <br /> As he had noted in his May 15th memorandum recommending plat approval , <br /> Mr. Berg advised there will be no variances to .ordinance requirements <br /> necessary for the project as proposed and the plat had been reviewed <br /> by the Public Works and Fire Departments as well as utility companies , <br /> Ramsey County, and the Rice Creek Watershed District. He said the <br /> latter had recommended minor modifications in the drainage plans <br /> which shouldn't jeopardize the development with the major modification <br /> only requiring the second set of .units (Block 2) to be built one <br /> foot higher than originally planned and a berm to keep the surface <br /> waters runoff on the property to be drained off on the northwest <br /> corner. . The placement of a fire hydrant will be negotiated with the <br /> City as indicated by Mr. Hamer in his May 1st review of the plat. <br /> The City Attorney had addressed the question of the property owner- <br /> ship in his May 12th review, recommending this be documented before <br /> the final plat approval. <br /> Staff was requested to research whether the PUD zoning for the <br /> property. should be revoked now that it is rezoned to R-3 , multiple <br /> dwelling district. <br /> The Commission discussed with the developer and Mr. Berg -the site <br /> and elevation, drainage, and grading plans submitted by Mr. Johnson <br /> • as well as points of access and egress for -townhome owners for the <br /> site. Mr. Johnson assured them that, even with the changes requested <br /> by the Rice Creek Watershed District, the proposal will "meet all City <br /> guidelines and ordinances regarding setbacks , parking and density <br /> with no variances necessary" . When asked for a firm timeframe for <br /> construction, the developer said, taking into consideration the <br /> existing economic climate, processing the FHA financing will take <br /> from four to six months but he expects to begin construction on the <br /> five southernmost units by early August, progressing northward as <br /> the market dictates. He estimates the entire project will be completed <br /> by next year, but told the Commission it will impose a great hardship <br /> on him if time constraints are placed on him now. Mr. Bowerman <br /> said no such constraints are placed by the City on industrial con- <br /> struction and .he doesn' t believe such constraints are necessary for <br /> this project. Mr. Sopcinski asked Mr. Johnson to describe the <br /> exterior finish of the buildings so "the residents ' concerns regard- <br /> ing appearance may be answered" . His reply was that "with an asking <br /> price for each unit .of between $65,000 and $75 ,000 , it will be to . <br /> his advantage to develop a project as aesthetically pleasing as <br /> economics permit" . He said the exterior for all units will not <br /> necessarily be the same but will probably be of rough sawn cedar, <br /> with as much brick as the market will allow. His plan is to save as <br /> many trees on the property as possible and replace those he has to <br /> take down with trees, such as ash, which have the best chance of <br /> survival. He said, . "the six foot fence will remain at the back of <br /> • the property" but accepted the statement from Lloyd Hedman, 3924 <br /> Penrod Lane, that "whether the fence stays up or not, is up to the <br /> property owners on Penrod who own it" . None of the other. property <br /> owners spoke either for or against the proposal. <br /> The hearing was closed at 8 :55 P .M. <br />