Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br /> published May _ 5th., in the .Bulletin. No one present reported failure to <br /> receive the notice or, objected to ::its content. <br /> ' In the absence of the applicant,. Russell Underhill, 2518 Hayes Street <br /> N.E. , the Manager- explained that� Mr. Underhill was requesting he be <br /> permitted to 'attach an eight foot wide, two foot long sign to the <br /> existing "For. Lease." sign at the Kenzie Terrace entrance to the St. <br /> Anthony. Village Shopping Center,. which Max Saliterman, the sign owner <br /> had agreed to in writing. The Manager said the antique shop proprietor <br /> had told him .he believes his customers are having difficulty locating <br /> him in the center without that signage. <br /> Mr. Childs reported. that Mr. Underhill .has been advised that the staff <br /> would be recommending denial of .his request for the reasons addressed <br /> in the May 13th memorandum' .from the Public [corks Director and it <br /> would, therefore, -be to the advantage of the applicant to present his <br /> request -in person. <br /> No one appeared to speak. for or against the variance and the hearing <br /> was closed at 8: 15 P.M. for a determination by- the Commission. <br /> Motion by Commissioner. Zawis.lak and seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund <br /> to recommend the Council deny the request from Russell Underhill for <br /> a variance to..the Sign Ordinance which would permit the antique shop <br /> proprietor to attach an 8 ' X 2 ' sign to the existing non-conforming <br /> sign at the entrance to St. Anthony. Village Shopping Center finding that: <br /> (-1) The new Sign Ordinance permits the identif-ication of each tenant <br /> in the. shopping center with signage on the building itself and pro- <br /> hibits a general listing of tenants on the signage for the center, <br /> which might well be the precedent set if the request were approved. <br /> (2) None of the conditions set for granting any variance to the sign <br /> ordinance -appear to have been addressed in the application, specifi- <br /> cally, that (-a) there would appear to be -no particular hardship for <br /> this. business than would be experienced by other commercial busi- <br /> nesses in the same center if- the strict letter of the regulations <br /> are adhered to, and (b), the condition upon which the application <br /> was. based could not be considered -to- be unique to this parcel <br /> and not applicable, generally, . to .other stores in the same center . <br /> (3)_ The failure of the applicant to be present for the consideration <br /> of his request precluded any other recommendation, based on the <br /> information which had been submitted. <br /> (4) The manner' in which -the sign to which the requested signage .would <br /> be attached has been maintained would seem to justify not adding <br /> to it. <br /> Motion carried unanimously . <br /> Mr. Childs reported the Burger Chef . franchise had been sold to the <br /> parent company of Hardees and the former Burger Chef. franchisees , <br /> • Mr. - and Mrs . Ken. Johnson intend to continue to run .the restaurant at <br /> 4004 Silver Lake Road as a Hardees restaurant. They- are therefore <br />