Laserfiche WebLink
-5- <br /> • 1 No one appeared to speak for or against .the proposal and the hearing was closed at <br /> 2 8:35 P.M. Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he perceived this to be a very pro: <br /> 3 gressive idea for improving .the appearance of the entry way to the City and a unique <br /> 4 use of property which was not being utilized. He approved of. not encouraging <br /> 5 access off Lowry and believed the project could be expected to increase the land <br /> 6 values and jobs for the area. The Commissioner also perceives the view from the <br /> 7 condominium housing could be much improved but wanted assurances built into the <br /> 8 recommendation of approval -that they would not be annoyed by the air condi-tioning. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Commissioner Hansen viewed the proposal -as a very positive addition to the City and <br /> 11 liked the addition of trees in the project. plans. He indicated he would have no <br /> 12 problem with the variances for parking but questioned the distances from the con- <br /> 13 dominium homes. Mr. Childs told him Arkell. has to provide screening and a buffer <br /> 14 between the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project and its abutting neighbors. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Commissioner Wagner indicated he- was anxious to see the project go forward. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Commissioner Franzese liked the architectural treatment of an unattractive building <br /> 19 and agreed the- office condominiums would be a.welcome addition to that area. She <br /> 20 was happy with the proposed exterior treatment of the building and perceived safety <br /> 21 would be provided with the stair enclosures in the back. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 The Chairman indicated. he was also pleased to see this improvement for that portion <br /> 24 of the City. <br /> 25 - <br /> 2 6 Motion by Commissioner Bowerman and seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund to recommend <br /> • <br /> 27 the Council grant Jerry Isaacs and Associates the necessary- parking and setback <br /> 28 variances to allow the conversion of the .Northgate Motel , 2526 Highway 88, into <br /> 29 approximately 19 units of office condominiums; specifically., eight .stall variance I <br /> 30 to the City Ordinance requirement for 74 parking spaces, with no more than 50% <br /> 31 of those, downgraded to 8! X 19 foot spaces to .accomodate compact cars; and the <br /> 32 variance necessary to allow the extension of the existing north line of the build- <br /> 33 ing to provide enclosed stairways and an arcade passthrough to the condominiums <br /> 34 on that side. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 The Commission recommends granting these variances contingent upon the building <br /> 37 mechanics being enclosed to the extent they don 't increase the ambient sound units <br /> 38 and the landscaping is done according to the building footprint plan presented by <br /> 39 the architects. The Commission finds that: <br /> 40 <br /> 41 1 . The removal. of the existing non-conforming free standing sign in front of the <br /> 42 building seems 'to be a good trade-off for granting the variances; <br /> _4.3- <br /> 4 4 2. The hardship would be to turn down a project which would- be such an asset to the <br /> 45 community when compared to the existing structure; <br /> 46 <br /> 47 3. Granting these variances could not be expected to be detrimental to abutting <br /> 48 properties; and <br /> 49 <br /> 50 4. The three conditions which require satisfaction_ appear to have been met with <br /> 51 the proposal. as presented. <br /> 1052 <br /> 53 :'Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />