Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> -4- <br /> • 1 No one present objected to having this done and the hearing was closed at 8:22 <br /> 2 P.M. . <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Before a motion"was made, the Manager confirmed for Commissioner Jones '_benefit <br /> 5 that -the ordinance permitted .a deck to protrude -to within 20 feet of the required <br /> 6 rear yard setback. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Motion by Commissioner Bowerman and seconded. by Commissioner Jones to recommend <br /> 9 the Council - grant the request from Bernard- B.lanske for preliminary plat approval <br /> 10 for the parcel he owns at the southeast corner of Silver Lake Road and Silver <br /> 11 Lane generally described as the Blanske Addi.tion.or that part of Lot 1. except <br /> 12 the east 137.8 feet lying north of Lot 2 and its extension west being in south <br /> 13 Lot 1 Block 1 , which would allow -the developer to construct the 8 townhouses on <br /> 14 his property which was rezoned for that purpose in November, 1985. In recom- <br /> 15 mending plat approval , the Commission recognizes the parcel in .question has a <br /> 16 total area of only 31 ,919 square feet, which i-s 81 square feet short of the area <br /> 17 required by the Ordinance for- the project, but considering this to be insignificant <br /> 18 when compared to the total concept, recommends that- the Council further grant <br /> 19 a variance for the 81 square feet,' finding that: <br /> 20 <br /> 21 1 . One of the reasons for the area size deficiency was that the property owner <br /> 22 had deeded to the community, at no cost, to the City, land for a right hand <br /> 23 turn on the corner of- Silver Lane and Silver Lake Road; and <br /> 24 <br /> 25 2. No opposition to the townhouse project had been expressed since that concept had <br /> 26 first been proposed. <br /> • 27 <br /> 28 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 At 8:30 P.M. the Chair Pro Tem opened -the hearing to consider the request from <br /> 31 Rick Johnson, 3306 Belden .Drive, for three adjustments to the Johnson Manor and <br /> 32 Belden Terrace listed in the notice of the hearing which had been published in the <br /> 33 July 2nd Bulletin and sent to all property owners of record within 350 feet of <br /> 34 the subject property. No one present reported failure to receive the notice or <br /> 35 objected to its content. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 In his memorandum related to the matter, Mr. Childs had advised the Commissioners <br /> 38 that staff was recommending approval of three requests explained by Mr. Johnson <br /> 39 in the July 3rd letter he had attached to -his application for subdivision/plat <br /> 40 approval . '. <br /> E 41 <br /> 42 Mr. Johnson reiterated many of the points he had made in that letter, telling <br /> 43 Commissioner Madden that it had been h.is own lack of understanding that tennis <br /> 44 courts had to run north and south which had resulted in his having to deed an <br /> 45 additional 18 X 60 foot piece of land from Outlot B to the Homeowners Association <br /> 46 to complete the construction of the courts. He also explained that the City would <br /> 47 need an additional ten. foot easement on the south side of Lot 'l -to service the <br /> 48 storm sewer extension for Johnson Manor and the applicant indicated it had been <br /> 49 necessary for him to transfer the' 495 square foot pie shaped piece of land from <br /> 50 vacant Lot 10 to Lot 11 to correct a setback error he had made when he constructed <br /> 51 an addition to his existing garage too close to his property line. <br />+, • 52 <br /> 53 Frances (Frenchy) Von Dell , 3312 Belden Drive, was present to express his concerns <br /> 54 about the type of house which was going to be built on Lot 10, saying he "didn't <br /> 55 think it would fit in with the other homes along Belden Drive. " Mr. Von Dell <br /> 56 also questioned- why the notice of the hearing had indicated the tennis courts on <br />