Laserfiche WebLink
_9_ <br /> . 1 Funds Not Feasible for Shopping Center Renovation <br /> 2 <br /> 3 The Manager explained the problems the City is having getting even <br /> 4 leases signed for the St. Anthony Shopping Center which would seem <br /> 5 to preclude using CDBG funds to upgrade the center' s appearance. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 The hearing was closed at 9: 05 P.M. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Commission Recommendation <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Motion by Hansen and seconded by Wingard to recommend the City <br /> 12 Council allocate the CDBG monies of approximately $26, 460 (exact <br /> 13 amount to be yet determined) to the following activities: <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Activity Budget <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Pedestrian Signal on Kenzie $22 ,491.00 <br /> 18 Continuation of Senior Citizens Programs 3 ,969. 00 <br /> 19 through District #282 Community Service <br /> 20 $26,460 . 00 <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 MISCELLANEOUS <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Sign Criteria for Apache Plaza <br /> • 27 <br /> 28 As requested,. the City Manager had secured a copy of the shopping <br /> 29 center ' s sign criteria for exterior signs which had been included in <br /> 30 the Commission' s agenda packet as informational. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Food and Fuel Store Request Withdrawn <br /> 33 <br /> 34 As he had advised in his March 11th memorandum, Mr. Childs said the <br /> 35 protests of neighboring residents had apparently forced the the <br /> 36 application for the above to be withdrawn at the March 9th Roseville <br /> 37 Council meeting. The Manager reported that one local developer <br /> 38 might be interested in erecting some one story townhomes on the site <br /> 39 at the corner of 33rd Avenue N.E. and Old Highway 8, if the zoning <br /> 40 in changed to residential. The development company seems to feel <br /> 41 there Iwould be a market for that type of unit because many <br /> 42 prospective buyers of townhomes have expressed a desire for units <br /> 43 with no stairs. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 NEW BUSINESS <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Proposed Ordinance Changes Discussed <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Commissioner Hansen took exception to the report in the February <br /> 5.0 24th minutes that it had been the Planning Commission who had <br /> 51 changed the number of unrelated persons who could reside in a home <br /> 52 from 4 to 3 , saying the draft the Ordinance which the Attorney had <br /> 53 marked up had specified 3 to start with. The secretary said she <br /> 54 recalled Councilmember Marks ' statements had only been an <br /> 55 <br />