PL MINUTES 12191989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• 13 1 Number l might confuse a stranger who was approaching Autumn 2 Woods and cause one to turn into the wrong driveway before 3 they were able to see the monument sign. He expressed the 4 view that the monument sign was sufficient advertising 5 signage for the site . Mr . Brewer disagreed , stating that a 6 motorist approaching Autumn Woods from the southwest on 7 Kenzie might miss the main driveway beside the monument sign 8 if they weren ' t forewarned by Sign Number 1 that they were 9 approaching the Autumn Woods entrance . He suggested that 10 two monument signs_ were actually needed since the complex 11 has two main entrances . 12 13 that. 11 iii 1 t� a:l_ _ , v:h=rc the �n is 15 the other entrance is there more to control traffic . iJr . 16 Brewer replied that there would be less of a problem if 17 Building C could be accessed from the main entrance . 13 Commissioner Hansen stated that certainly people living in 19 Building C would be familiar with the access to their 20 building , but Mr . Brewer stated that people visiting the 21 complex ,night need .the additional .directional assistance . 22 23 Commissioner Werenicz complimented Iir. Brewer and LaNel on 24 the package they had put together for this meeting, and 25 thanked them for the additional information, which would aid 26 the Commissioners in their analysis . He commented that he 27 would approve Sign Number 1 , particularly since it has been 28 scaled down. He agreed with Mr. Brewer that two monument 29 signs would be logical , but that Sign Number 1 would serve 30 the purpose of a second monument sign. He stated that Signs 31 Number 2 and 3 were superfluous because the rental office is 32 visible from the monument sign, although he agreed that the 33 rental office should be marked in some fashion. He 34 suggested that either Sign Number 2 should be scaled down or 35 the numbers themselves made larger . Commissioner Werenicz 36 agreed that the signs were advertising in nature as well as 37 directional , but felt that that was outweighed by the fact 38 that the signs are very attractive . 3.0 40 Chairperson Madden agreed that the signs are not strictly 41 directional in nature but are a combination of advertising 42 and directional . He agreed that four signs were necessary, 43 but questioned the large size and the advertising. 44 Commissioner Wagner suggested that the advertising could be 45 left on Signs Number l and 3, but removed from the Signs 46 Number 2 and 4 . 47 48 Mr . Brewer acknowledged the Commissioners ' comments . -ie 49 reiterated that LaNel desires uniform signage . He rferred 50 the Commissioners to the example of the Twin Lake Horth