My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 10201992
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1992
>
PL MINUTES 10201992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:20:10 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:20:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1992
SP Name
PL MINUTES 10201992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> OCTOBER 20 , 1992 <br /> 3 PAGE 9 <br /> 4 <br /> 6 Upon receiving the report of the Ad Hoc Committee, the Council <br /> 7 felt additional input should be received and referred the <br /> 8 matter back to the Planning Commission. The intention of this <br /> 9 referral was for the Planning Commission to receive community <br /> 10 input at its meeting and report its findings back to the City <br /> 11 Council . <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Staff also supplied information regarding parking restrictions <br /> 14 in three other communities which have provisions similar to <br /> 15 the proposals being discussed for St . Anthony. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Commissioner Gondorchin felt a subcommittee should be <br /> 18 appointed to address this issue. He distributed a document <br /> 19 which contained his thoughts and comments on various parts of <br /> 20 the proposed ordinance. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Mary Rockwood, 3404 Silver Lake Road, stated her opposition to <br /> 23 the ordinance. She noted that her recreational vehicle is in <br /> 24 very good condition and that the only view which it blocks in <br /> 25 front of her home is hers . She has pursued parking it <br /> 26 elsewhere and felt all of the options were too far away and <br /> costly as well as holding the potential for vandalism. She <br /> 40 inquired if this ordinance is approved, whether the City would <br /> 29 be willing to provide secure places to park recreational <br /> 30 vehicles . <br /> 31 <br /> 32 The City Manager corrected the ;misunderstanding that this <br /> 33 ordinance focuses exclusively on ,recreational vehicles as it <br /> 34 does not . <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Sande Antczak, 3501 36th Avenue, told the Commission she was <br /> 37 advised when she moved into the City that parking of <br /> 38 recreational equipment was not prohibited. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Jeff Kennedy, 2800 Hilldale Avenue, requested that no change <br /> 41 be made and viewed this . issue as "passing the buck. " He owns <br /> 42 a tent trailer which he wants to leave parked on his property. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 William Zawislak, 2500 34th Avenue, advised he had served on <br /> 45 the Planning Commission and recalls that many residents were <br /> 46 told a number of years ago that the parking of recreational <br /> 47 vehicles was permitted on private property. He noted that <br /> 48 paved surfaces were required and many property owners went to <br /> 49 some expense to meet this requirement . He also felt that off- <br /> 50 site parking space for this equipment is very costly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.