PL MINUTES 10201992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 20 , 1992 3 PAGE 8 4 5 6 being approved, the neighbor to the east had a mixed 7 statement , and the Planning Commission finds that a hardship 8 does exist . 9 10 Roll call : Thompson, Franzese, Gondorchin, werenicz., Madden - 11 aye 12 Murphy, Faust - nay 13 14 Motion carries 15 16 6 . MISCELLANEOUS 17 18 A. Proposed Parking Ordinance 19 20 The City Manager noted that this ordinance had been 21 recommended by the Planning Commission to receive approval by 22 a vote of six to one. After this recommendation received 23 coverage in the local newspapers , many residents contacted 24 City Councilmembers and staff in City Hall regarding its 25 implementation and how it would impact their particular 6 situations . An Ad Hoc Committee on the Parking Ordinance was established 29 and met to discuss the matter. Members of the Committee agreed 30 that the City was visually in good condition. They had some 31 ideas as possible ways to accomplish the issue of image and 32 neighborhood aesthetics versus the proposed parking ordinance. 33 34 Consideration was given to the Housing Maintenance Code which 35 is presently being considered by the City Council . Also 36 suggested was for the City to require a permit for all 37 property owners who park commercial or recreational vehicles, 38 recreational and utility trailers or watercraft on their 39 property. The permit would be an agreement on how the vehicles 40 or equipment would be stored. 41 42 The Ad Hoc Committee also suggested that a Beautification 43 Committee be appointed to handle complaints between neighbors 44 and resident complaints on the appearance of another' s 45 property. A variation of the Beautification Committee could be 46 City mediation whereby City staff would make initial contact 47 in neighbor complaints . If no resolution of the problem could 48 be reached by City staff , the matter could be referred to the 49 services of Dispute Resolution. 50