My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 06181996
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1996
>
PL MINUTES 06181996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2015 8:24:11 AM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:02:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1996
SP Name
PL MINUTES 06181996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> • June 18, 1996 <br /> Page 8 <br /> 1 Commissioner Franzese asked how far the adjacent property owner was from the lot line. Ms. <br /> 2 Moore-Sykes stated she was unsure but noted Mr. Lutterman had spoken with the neighbors and <br /> 3 they have no problem with the privacy or the distance. <br /> 4 Mrs. Susan Lutterman, 3433 Croft Drive, stated she did not have the neighbor's side yard setback <br /> 5 measurements. She noted that the irons have been identified and this could be measured. She <br /> 6 stated they had talked with the neighbors and received verbal agreement in regard to the project. <br /> 7 Commissioner Gondorchin stated he liked to see projects of this kind go forward. He <br /> 8 acknowledged the odd configuration of the lot and.suggested a professional survey be obtained if <br /> 9 there was any doubt or confusion as to the actual lot line. He asked why the project would be <br /> 10 extended into the next year. <br /> 11 Mrs. Lutterman stated the reason was that it had not yet been decided if they would construct a <br /> 12 two-season porch or a three season porch. <br /> 13 There was Commission consensus to approve of the concept of the variance for William and <br /> 14 Susan Lutterman, 3433 Croft Drive. <br /> Al. Concept Review of Rezoning Request- Krueger. <br /> 41 Ms. Moore-Sykes explained this request was for rezoning of the property to allow another family <br /> 17 to live in the lower level of the house and make the home a two-family unit. Ms. Moore-Sykes <br /> 18 noted she had informed Mr. Krueger that spot zoning is not done in St. Anthony. <br /> 19 Commissioner Gondorchin stated he was in opposition to the request. He felt that permitting <br /> •20 residents in the City of St. Anthony to rent rooms would be detrimental to the community. <br /> 21 There was Commission consensus that this rezoning would not be beneficial to the community., <br /> 22 is down-zoning, and may not be allowed by City Code. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 C. Review of the City's LCA Housing Action Plan. <br /> 25 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated this draft would be forwarded to the Met Council following its approval <br /> 26 by the City Council on June 25, 1996. The document describes what the City can do and what <br /> 27 tools and funds to use, to attract, enhance and maintain affordable life-cycle housing in St. <br /> 28 Anthony. It includes benchmarks which the City of St. Anthony currently meets or exceeds and <br /> 29 will strive to maintain. She explained the Met Council would like the City of St. Anthony to be <br /> 30 more flexible in their land use, allow for larger homes on smaller lots and increase density <br /> 31 slightly. <br /> 32 Chair Bergstrom asked if the City of St. Anthony had internal funding sources for improvements <br /> to residential housing. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated the City did not. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.