My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 10181983 (2)
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1983
>
PL PACKET 10181983 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:31:04 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:30:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1983
SP Name
PL PACKET 10181983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> He also reported the City has no money tied up in the project at all , <br /> since the land was sold to the redevelopers for more than it cost. <br /> The City will give a Quit Claim Deed for the disputed land between <br /> the project and the mobile home park but the project itself would not <br /> be affected no matter how the redevelopers choose to handle it. <br /> The request from Irving Walbon' s attorney, Robert Halva, 3948 Central <br /> Avenue N.E. , for concept approval for the division of the parcel on <br /> the corner of Old Highway 8 and 33rd Avenue N.E. into two residential <br /> lots had been included in the agenda packet along with a copy of the <br /> half section sheet identifying that property; a copy of the City <br /> ordinance pertinent to the request. The Manager 's direction to the <br /> Commission related to the lot split request was also included. <br /> Mr. Halva was present to discuss his client's request that the parcel <br /> owned by Mr. Walbon, which is approximately 20 ,000 square feet, be <br /> split into two residential lots to be built on sometime in the future . <br /> The attorney explained that his purpose in coming before the Commission <br /> was to assure his client that the resultant configuration of lots <br /> developed with the split would be acceptable to the City . <br /> There was a brief discussion of the historical background of the <br /> triangular jog of land into the other property owned by Mr. Walbon <br /> • to the rear of the parcel , which, if left in the parcel, would bring <br /> both proposed lots into compliance with the City Ordinance , according <br /> to the attorney. However, assuming the City would prefer the back <br /> property lines being straightened out, Mr. Halva indicated his client <br /> would be willing to develop the lots in any manner, including angling <br /> the lot lines , the Commission might suggest. His primary purpose <br /> in coming before them was to ascertain before an expensive survey is <br /> made, whether or not two residential lots are possible for that parcel . <br /> Commissioner Jones indicated he perceived there must have been at <br /> least a 25 foot right-of-way provided between this parcel ' s lot line <br /> and Old Highway 8 before it was downgraded , which would constitute <br /> an extenuating circumstance under which a variance for the lot split <br /> could be granted if necessary, and said he personally would have no <br /> problem with the lot split which would eliminate the jog in the back <br /> of the property. Commissioner Franzese agreed but wondered if some <br /> guidelines should be set for providing uniformity in backyard setbacks . <br /> No formal action was taken but a poll of the Commission members indicated <br /> agreement with having the outside dimensions surveyed and street set- <br /> backs verified, with the understanding that the Commission would work <br /> with Mr. Walbon's attorney to make the lot lines work when the formal <br /> request for a lot split comes before them. <br /> . Motion by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Franzese <br /> to adjourn the meeting at 8 :15 P.M. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Helen Crowe, Secretary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.