My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 04031984
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1984
>
PL PACKET 04031984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:31:38 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:31:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1984
SP Name
PL PACKET 04031984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> --REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> • -------------- ------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number <br /> X Concept Review <br /> M arch 30, 1984 p Public Hearings-a <br />? Date Action Formal Action/Motion Title <br /> Re quested Informational <br /> l q Other Kenzie Terrace P.U.D. <br /> April 3, 1984 <br /> i <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> 9 <br /> TO: St. Anthony Planning Commission <br /> a <br /> FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager - <br /> P ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: This is a reques for P.U.D. approval from <br /> Arkell Developmen ;ar,& Walker-Methodist Homes for a 4 unit 202 Senior Rental Project <br /> to be located o 55,00 square feet south of Kenzie Terrace on the present site of <br /> g the Mimosa Restaurant. This proposal must comply with both the P.U. D. ordinance and <br /> the minimum improvements section of our Redevelopment Agreement with Arkell Develop- <br /> s ment. Areas of non-compliance with the Redevelopers Agreement include: <br /> t <br /> 1 . Wood, rather than brick exterior. <br /> 2. Building is not sprinkled. <br /> l 3. 15 parking spaces rather than 45 are provided. <br /> These items do not .conform because in the Redevelopers Agreement , the concept was <br /> originally for a 5 story building. Because of HUD regulations, the building must be <br /> designed as presented 'without a number of extra amenities to be eligible for funding. <br /> Review with respect to the P.U.D. requirements shows that a 17' setback is provided <br /> on the southeast side of the building (25 ' is required) . Density is 35 units per <br /> acre (much less than Phase 1 ) . 45 units are proposed and without P.U.D. approval, 23 <br /> would be allowed in R-4 zoning. The building meets the height and parking require- <br /> ments of the ordinance. Unit size is 540 square feet, which is less than the 650 <br /> square feet required in R-4 zoning. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the P.U.D. as proposed unless the Com- <br /> mission has modifications they wish to recommend. <br /> ATTACHMENTS : <br /> X PlanApplication Form <br /> X Mailing List. Letters. of -Support/.Objection <br /> _X-Notice of- .Hearing <br /> CITY MANAGER',S '.REVIEW: . COLIMENTS- _.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.