My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 02201990
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1990
>
PL PACKET 02201990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:40:34 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:40:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1990-1991
SP Name
PL PACKET 02201990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> 1 Wagner added that he thought the Sign Number 1 with the <br /> 2 advertising might be misleading and cause motorists on <br /> 3 Kenzie Terrace to turn in the wrong driveway before they see <br /> 4 the monument sign . He stated that he saw no need for <br /> 5 advertising on Sign Number 4 , which is in the back, and that <br /> 6 he saw no need for advertising on Sign Number 2 , which is <br /> 7 only about 50 feet from the monument sign. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Mr. Brewer replied that LaNel felt very strongly about <br /> 10 repeating the wording and logo on all their signs similar to <br /> 11 the Twin Lake North development . He stated that consistent <br /> 12 signs with the wording and logo give a more professional <br /> - -- --1-3 - appear-ance-to—the—pro-je.c-t-,—and—tha.t_-s.i.gna.ge__i.s—ext.r_emely _ <br /> 14 important in organizing a cc;;:plex . Com.missicr _r ??agr�er <br /> 15 interjected that the ComilliSSIon aC`reeS kTl`.h ti? i?_ed for <br /> 16 directional signage . 1•Sr . Brewer stated , for an example , <br /> 17 that Sign Number 1 would be raised_ and landscaped so that it <br /> 18 would be above the snow line . <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Commissioner Wagner indicated to Mr . Brewer that he <br /> 21 considered the signs attractive and professionally built , <br /> 22 but that he still objected to the advertising nature of <br /> 23 them, and felt that they were not strictly directional <br /> 24 signs . Commissioner Hansen expressed his agreement with <br /> 25 Commissioner Wagner ' s comments . He added that he felt the <br /> 26 wording was an unnecessary distraction to one who is looking <br /> 27 for an apartment number . He stated that he would rather <br /> 28 have the numbers even larger to assure that people would be <br /> 29 able to read them. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Commissioner Brownell described a hypothetical scenario in <br /> 32 which a motorist drives through the complex and has <br /> 33 difficulty understanding the directional signs because the <br /> 34 numbers are not in logical sequence . He asked Mr. Brewer to <br /> 35 comment on that scenario. Mr . Brewer reminded Mr. Brownell <br /> 36 that each apartment has its number above its own door, and <br /> 37 those that face the parking lot would be visible from the <br /> 38 parking lot. He described which units have numbers visible <br /> 39 from the parking lot and driveway and which ones do not . <br /> 40 Commissioner Brownell pointed out that Sign Number 3 is <br /> 41 strictly an advertising sign marking the location of the <br /> 42 rental center; and serves no other purpose such as directing <br /> 43 a motorist to another area of the complex. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 City Manager Burt commented that , from his personal <br /> 46 experience, the only necessary directional sign is Sign <br /> 47 Number 4 because those units -face the internal courtyard. <br /> 48 Commissioner Wagner pointed out that in his view Sign Number <br /> 49 1 and Sign Number 2 did serve a purpose in directing <br /> 50 motorists . Commissioner Hansen agreed, but stated that Sign <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.