My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 11101990
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1990
>
PL PACKET 11101990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:41:25 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:41:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1990-1991
SP Name
PL PACKET 11101990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION 2 <br /> MINUTES. October 16, 1990 <br /> 1 •2 VanderHeyden reported thata developer would do this type of analysis <br /> 3 usually before building. There is nothing standing vacant. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Brownell asked if the townhomes are for owner occupancy, therefore being <br /> 6 homesteaded, or if they are going to be rental. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 The developer reported that they will be owner occupied. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 The application requires that a map be submitted showing the land proposed <br /> 11 to be rezoned and all lands within 350 feet of its boundaries. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 VanderHeyden said that there are two sides light industrial and two sides <br /> 14 residential. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Chairman Madden questioned whether traffic on Foss Road has been studied <br /> 17 and indicated the traffic is already heavy on the 30 foot wide residential <br /> 18 street. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Madden pointed out that the building on the west side of the site is using the <br /> 21 south side of their property as a junk yard; and he recommended the City <br /> 22 look into the matter. • <br /> 23 <br /> 24 He suggested that there could be access from Chandler Drive as well as Foss <br /> 25 Road to help the traffic problem because Chandler is much wider. Madden <br /> 26 questioned whether rezoning guaranteed that townhomes would be on the <br /> 27 property. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 It was not determined which zoning provides the City with the greater <br /> 30 amount of revenue.when developed. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 VanderHeyden said that Harstad was in the process of buying the property. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Murphy discussed the question of the site development, considering the lot <br /> 35 area per unit.. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Hansen said that the number and size of units should wait for future <br /> 38 discussion after the rezoning. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Faust questioned whether the two residential homes that are in light <br /> 41 industrial are owner occupied and if there is a plan to move them or rezone. <br /> 42 They could conceivably be resold and resold. • <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Public hearing opened at 7:5 L <br /> 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.